The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch
Blog Categories: Politics | News | Music | Do This! | Chow | Media | Cinema | Education | Arts and Culture | Fun in General | TV | Sports | more categories»
Thursday, June 25, 2015
Legal Battles Over Redistricting Have Cost More Than $3.6 Million
Posted By Jim Nintzel on Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:19 PM
With the Obamacare decision out today, the Supreme Court has just handful of decision left to release.
One of them is Arizona Legislature v. AIRC, which will decide if Arizona voters are allowed to give an independent panel the power to draw congressional district boundaries or whether state lawmakers have that exclusive power.
While awaiting the decision, Mitch Martinson of Arizona's Politics has run the numbers on how much has been spent in the legal battle over the Independent Redistricting Commission:
One of them is Arizona Legislature v. AIRC, which will decide if Arizona voters are allowed to give an independent panel the power to draw congressional district boundaries or whether state lawmakers have that exclusive power.
While awaiting the decision, Mitch Martinson of Arizona's Politics has run the numbers on how much has been spent in the legal battle over the Independent Redistricting Commission:
To come up with our revised post-redistricting, partisan litigation number of $3.65M+, we removed the $1.2M in "General" legal fees, the $578K incurred in fighting then-Attorney General Tom Horne's challenge of the AIRC's open meetings, and the $182K expended to fight then-Governor Jan Brewer's action for removal. We then added the $360K paid by the Arizona Legislature to local law firm Davis Miles and U.S. Supreme Court expert Paul Clement, as part of the case that Arizona (and several other states) are anxiously awaiting a decision from the Justices (within the next couple of weeks).
There are presently three live cases against the AIRC, all from either Republican lawmakers, or Republican-philic interests. Surprisingly, the AIRC has spent THE LEAST in outside legal expenses on the Arizona Legislature v. AIRC case about to be decided by the Supreme Court.
This is partly because it is a Constitutional challenge that did not require much time-intensive (costly) discovery, and partly because the U.S. Supreme Court expert Seth Waxman surprisingly agreed to represent the Redistricting Commission pro bono. That saved Arizona taxpayers somewhere between $300-500,000.***
Comments (4)
Showing 1-4 of 4
Previously in the Range
-
Dr. Word Says: Trump Tries His Hand at Poetry
- Jul 19, 2017
-
Flake Loves Him Some Cruzcare
- Jul 18, 2017
-
Flake Takes a Turn To the Right
- Jul 13, 2017
- More »
More by Jim Nintzel
-
Editor's Note
An Ailing Healthcare Reform
- Jul 20, 2017
-
The Ward 3 Tucson City Council Zona Politics Debate
- Jul 18, 2017
-
The Skinny
Stopping school voucher program, campaign for vacant City Council seat, and radio woes for John C. Scott
- Jul 13, 2017
- More »
Staff Pick
Be-You-tiful Women's Body Image Workshop
Presented by Yoga in the Buff. Bring a mat, towel, journal and pen. Bring a friend! Everything… More
@ Floor Polish
Sat., July 22, 3-5 p.m.
215 N Hoff Ave, Suite 107
Popular Content
- The Weekly List: 13 Things To Do In Tucson In The Next 10 Days (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
- Flake Takes a Turn To the Right (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
- Dr. Word Says: Trump Tries His Hand at Poetry (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
- Tour Diaries! XIXA Day 5: Winston Watson Weighs In on Some Stinks! (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
- Community Unites to Support India Oven (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
