Wednesday, August 1, 2012

County Supes Candidate Ally Miller Doesn't Understand Revenue Bonds

Posted By on Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:00 PM

At a debate last week between the four Republican candidates who want to replace Ann Day on the Pima County Board of Supervisors, Tea Party patriot Ally Miller slipped up big-time when talking about the county's road-bond program.

As you can see in the video above, captured by ace videographer Dino Kadich: Miller, a self-proclaimed budget expert, declared that the county “is using (HURF) money for the bonds that we should be paying for with our secondary property-tax rate. We should not be using HURF money to pay for bonds. And that’s what they’re doing, and they’re playing a shell game with the money, and they’re moving it around. … That is wrong, and it shouldn’t be happening, and it needs to stop. In the last five years—I’ve done an investigation here—$80 million has been raided.”

Miller is evidently unaware that county voters, when they passed a 1997 bond package, specifically supported using HURF funds to pay off the roads bonds.

You could have argued against that route in 1997—as the Tucson Weekly did, saying that the county should use a pay-as-you-go approach instead of borrowing against HURF revenues. And you can say that the road-bond money, once it started coming in, wasn’t spent that well, as the late Chris Limberis argued in these pages back in 2001.

But you can’t say the money is being “raided” if it’s being used for the purpose for which voters said it should be used. What Miller is proposing—namely, using property taxes to pay back revenue bonds—is the sort of illegal shell game that she spends so much time bemoaning.

Also: It’s not much of an “investigation” if Miller can’t figure out at some point that her basic premise is wrong.

Call us old-fashioned, but we believe that if you're going to accuse someone of criminal acts, you ought to at least get your facts straight.

We emailed Miller to see if she wanted to clarify her comments, but she is evidently still not speaking to us.

We'll have more on Miller's debate performance—including her fierce denouncement of the Tucson Weekly—in this week's Skinny column, available on many newsstands now!

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

More by Jim Nintzel

  • Reel Deal

    Talking with Peggy Johnson about the Loft Cinema's summer makeover
    • May 18, 2017
  • Editor's Note

    The Bear Essentials
    • May 18, 2017
  • The Skinny

    There's no excuse for threatening to shoot U.S. Rep. Martha McSally
    • May 18, 2017
  • More »
Today | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun | Mon
PiYo Strength Class

PiYo Strength Class @ Floor Polish

Thursdays, 4:30-5:30 p.m.

All of today's events | Staff Picks

Staff Pick

Cheech and Chong

Cheech and Chong live at AVA Amphitheater with special guest Shelby Chong.… More

@ AVA: Anselmo Valencia Tori Amphitheater Sat., May 27, 8-11 p.m. Casino del Sol, 5655 W. Valencia Road.

» More Picks

Submit an Event Listing

Popular Content

  1. The Weekly List: 15 Things To Do In Tucson In The Next 10 Days (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  2. Ducey's 'Education Budget,' Part 2: 17 Percent of Schools Will Get A Big Bonus (Hint: It Helps to Have Lots of Rich Kids) (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  3. Can Voters Defeat the Vouchers-For-All Law? (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  4. The New Teacher Certification Rules: Is Everyone Else Wrong, or Am I? (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  5. Good, Available Child Care Benefits Society (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)

© 2017 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation