President Barack Obama’s administration is developing new restrictions aimed at curbing gun violence, including a change in the definition of “gun dealer” that would require background checks on sales at gun shows. The New York Times reports that Obama will hold a town hall meeting on gun violence this Thursday, on the evening of the fifth anniversary of the mass shooting at Gabby Giffords’ Congress on Your Corner:

The White House has focused in particular on an executive action that would detail who should be considered a high-volume gun dealer, a move that could expand background checks to a huge number of sales at gun shows and on the Internet.

Retired astronaut Capt. Mark Kelly, the husband of former congresswoman Gabby Giffords, talked with NBC’s Chuck Todd about that idea. Kelly, who has been fighting for stricter background checks and other firearm restrictions since the Newtown school gunfire massacre, told Todd that part of the resistance to expanding background checks is cultural: 

Well, I mean, the president and I have talked about this. I mean, when you look at places in middle America, people who make less money than they used to. I mean, I just saw this blog entry by Fareed Zakaria the other day, that the one area is middle aged white men, where life expectancy is going down. So you have this segment of society that just feels like they’re losing things. And they look at gun issues and the right to own a gun as one of those things that they might be losing.

Now, the other side of this, is we have horrific levels of gun violence, with nearly 100,000 people shot every year, 30,000 dead. And there are some solid things, like closing these background check loopholes, that will have a significant impact on the number of people that die in this nation.

You can watch the whole thing here.

Here’s a complete transcript:

CHUCK TODD:

Welcome back. President Obama is trying again to limit the number of guns in America. The president will meet with his attorney general, Loretta Lynch, tomorrow. And they’re going to discuss steps that he believes he can take legally, without Congress. One step he plans on taking is this: changing the definition of a gun dealer, so that people who sell firearms at gun shows fit that definition and have to use the background check system when they sell.

Essentially, this is the president’s way of closing the gun show loophole without Congress. In December, a gun safety advocate, Captain Mark Kelly and his wife, former Representative Gabby Giffords, who survived a horrific shooting five years ago this week, by the way, met with President Obama about some possible new gun measures. Well, the former NASA astronaut and cofounder of Americans for Responsible Solutions joins me now. Captain Kelly, welcome back to Meet the Press, sir.

CAPT. MARK KELLY:

Thanks, Chuck.

CHUCK TODD:

So I know you know some of what he might be considering. You have made recommendations to the president. The gun show loophole appears to be the most substantive idea out there. Is it feasible?

CAPT. MARK KELLY:

Well, we think it is. So after the Newtown tragedy, Congress tried to get passed a piece of legislation that would close those loopholes. It failed due to a filibuster in the Senate. And after that, Gabby and I directed our staff at Americans for Responsible Solutions to look for other alternatives.

And as it would turn out, the reason why we have some of these loopholes that you can drive a truck through with 40 percent of gun sales not requiring a background check, is because the way they define in the regulation, the way that they define being in the business of selling firearms.

CHUCK TODD:

Okay, let’s say he makes this change. You can’t really enforce the change without resources. And as you know, A.T.F. is an agency that is starved of resources. We did a comparison when it comes to regulation with the F.D.A., for instance. And over basically the last decade, the F.D.A. has seen over the last five years, the F.D.A. had seen a near 50 percent increase in its resources from Congress. A.T.F. not even 10 percent. In fact, they have fewer staff today than they did five years ago. If you don’t have the A.T.F. staff, you can’t enforce these new regulations.

CAPT. MARK KELLY:

Well, that’s true. And so, I mean, one of the other things we need to do is work on getting A.T.F. the money it needs to do its job. But the other side of that, Chuck, is that one of the things that has frustrated the A.T.F. for all these years is the fact that they know there are individuals out there selling hundreds, if not thousands of guns a year.

And they don’t have the authority to do anything about it. And these are guns that are often sold to criminals without a background check. And they can’t do anything about it. So we need to fix that part of this as well. But you’re right, the funding is important.

CHUCK TODD:

What is something, I know one of the things that you have said, we’ve had this conversation before, is you want to try to get, I guess, the East Coast or urban America to understand the gun culture in rural America. How do you translate that to the president?

CAPT. MARK KELLY:

Well, I mean, the president and I have talked about this. I mean, when you look at places in middle America, people who make less money than they used to. I mean, I just saw this blog entry by Fareed Zakaria the other day, that the one area is middle aged white men, where life expectancy is going down. So you have this segment of society that just feels like they’re losing things.

And they look at gun issues and the right to own a gun as one of those things that they might be losing. Now, the other side of this, is we have horrific levels of gun violence, with nearly 100,000 people shot every year, 30,000 dead. And there are some solid things, like closing these background check loopholes, that will have a significant impact on the number of people that die in this nation.

CHUCK TODD:

You know, though, a lot of people say if you just enforce the laws that are on the books, maybe some progress is made. Are you one of those that believes that?

CAPT. MARK KELLY:

Well, you know, it’s interesting that that is used by the gun lobby. Anyway, I heard it when I was testifying in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee. And what they’re getting at is actually charging the individuals, felons, who try to buy a gun and fail a background check.

What these individuals don’t point up that use, you know, that line of enforcing the current laws, is we have prevented felons and people who are domestic abusers, and people who are dangerously, mentally ill, from buying a gun nearly two million times because they failed a background check. Of course we need to enforce the laws. But at the same time, preventing those two million individuals from getting a gun has had a serious impact on gun violence.

Getting hassled by The Man Mild-mannered reporter

14 replies on “Mark Kelly: Closing Background Check Loopholes “Will Have a Significant Impact on the Number of People That Die in This Nation””

  1. “Will Have a Significant Impact on the Number of People That Die in This Nation”

    Any facts to back up that statement? We know Nintzel, pretending not to be a liberal hack, won’t ask.

  2. This will cause more people to die from stabbings, poisonings and being run over by cars.

    Killers will be killers. Eliminate the first time offenders to start with.

    For some reason they would rather take away your right to defend yourself.And they aren’t going to be there to save you.

    “Ground control to Major Mark,” take your protein pills and put your helmet on.

  3. “Will Have a Significant Impact on the Number of People That Die in This Nation”…..
    Fail. It can’t be controlled. criminals don’t follow gun laws

  4. That is not a town hall, it’s CNN. The scripts have already been passed out.

    If more gun laws would keep us safe we wouldn’t need a government. Why not try doing your jobs instead?

  5. We can’t even get a helmet law passed for motorcycle riders, which would save more lives than any gun law. Arizona’s seatbelt law, is so simple that, almost 40% of drivers ignore it. Gun laws are merely “feel good” legislature to gain control of it’s citizens. Governance is meaningless without trust.

  6. Jim Kelly makes some good points. I think the down-votes were reflexive, more than reflective.

    Legislation doesn’t do anything but make the common person feel better (There oughtta be a law!!!)

  7. OK, in a nutshell we have current laws that are not being enforced so lets pass new laws and see if we can enforce them. No impact on people who don’t follow laws (criminals).

    CT “You know, though, a lot of people say if you just enforce the laws that are on the books, maybe some progress is made. Are you one of those that believes that?”

    MK “Well, you know, it’s interesting that that is used by the gun lobby.”

    So don’t acknowledge that there are current laws in place that are not being enforced, just deflect the question (the gun lobby says this, must be stupid) and shill for new bright and shiny laws.

  8. Yep I agree, it really stopped the crazy guy that shot his wife, oh wait it didn’t. What a moron.

  9. “Will Have a Significant Impact on the Number of People That Die in This Nation”
    Jim Kelly’s wife could have had a “significant impact” on the number of people killed by the simple expedient of having a minimal level of security at her meeting. This resulted in six dead, including a little girl, and 19 wounded.
    The idea that a member of Congress could hold a public outdoor meeting without any security present was foolhardy and negligent. One guard with a weapon would have immediately noted the pre-shooting activity of the shooter. A young wild looking male jumping to the front of the line would have been a dead giveaway and any guard would have had his hand on weapon and ready to fire.
    I am sorry that Ms Giffords suffered such grievous injuries but it doesn’t change the fact that she and her staff are to a great deal culpable for this tragedy. If they had no security they should have canceled the event.

  10. Classic blame the victim there Frank.

    40% of gun sales occur without a background check. That seems significant. Reducing the number of guns on the street is an admirable goal and I applaud any actions in that direction.

  11. In his tearful speech Obama cited shootings at Ft Hood and San Bernadino. Weren’t those radical Islamists? Di he outlaw them getting guns? No, but he did eliminate doctor/patient confidentiality laws.

    It probably doesn’t matter as Doctors will be federal employees before this marxist leaves office.

    Worst President in the history of the US. Jimmy carter you are such a lucky man.

  12. Hey Mark, the New Years Eve killer of the young lady in Texas was just arrested in Yuma. He is a Marine.

    The governments’ own background check failed all of us, but especially her and her family. Who are you kidding?

  13. “Will Have a Significant Impact on the Number of People That Die in This Nation”…..

    OK. Facts? Stats? Anything?

Comments are closed.