Scott Zike makes black holsters for pistols, assault rifles and any other manner of weapon in between. And he’s selling them with a vengeance on this gray December morning, his inventory dangling overhead like so many dead crows.

Surrounding him is a sea of like-minded vendors at a gun show that fills one cavernous, rented room on Tucson’s southside.

Zike is a straight-ahead fellow who retired from the U.S. Army after 22 years and started manufacturing his gear soon after. He’s now based in Glendale.

His decidedly niche market became even more specialized over the past year. “One thing that happened was that people wanted my large magazine pouches because they wanted to use the 33-round mags,” he says. “So I was making the large pouches to fit over those extreme mags.”

He links this blossoming demand directly to the Jan. 8 shootings. That mass carnage was due in no small part to the fact that alleged shooter Jared Lee Loughner fitted his Glock pistol with a high-capacity, 33-round magazine.

After the shootings, Zike says, “people were worried those magazines were going to be taken off the shelf.”

But it’s not just endangered accessories that are driving folks to gun shows such as this one, operated by McMann’s Roadrunner, also based in Glendale.

One after another, dealers at the chatty gathering claim to have enjoyed a robust 2011. Rather than dampening gun sales, the Safeway shootings have apparently heightened paranoia that new gun restrictions would soon follow. For gun enthusiasts, the logical impulse is to buy what you can, while you can.

That perspective is not baseless. For instance, the oversized magazines that expedited Jared Loughner’s rampage and plumped up Scott Zike’s bottom line were outlawed as part of federal assault-weapons ban in 1994—although that prohibition was allowed to expire in 2004 under the watch of then-President George W. Bush.

Nonetheless, rather than prompting reflection over the social costs of laissez-faire gun control, mass shootings seem to spur a corresponding jump in firearms purchases. Gun sales spiked, for instance, following the 1999 massacre at Colorado’s Columbine High School. The same has occurred in the aftermath of Jan. 8; during the past year, an estimated 200,000 guns were bought from licensed Arizona dealers. That’s on top of the thousands of weapons purchased privately, or at gun shows such as this one.

The combustible pattern is further fed by national politics. According to the dealers I spoke with, the Loughner shootings fueled already-existing fears that the 2008 election of President Barack Obama would precipitate more gun restrictions. That paranoia persists despite the fact that, three years in, the Obama administration has pushed few reforms beyond better state-to-state enforcement against gun-traffickers, and beefed-up background checks.

If paranoia about gun control is your thing, then Arizona is your paradise.

In 1994, the Legislature passed a bill permitting residents to carry concealed weapons—as long as they were toting a state-issued permit. In 2000, then-NRA president Charlton Heston was invited to give the legislative session’s opening invocation. More-recent sessions saw the passage of bills allowing the possession of concealed weapons without permits or training, the designation of a state handgun—the Colt single-action Army revolver—and the strengthening of the ability for people to defend their homes or vehicles with firearms.

The Legislature also passed measures that block cities and towns from banning hunting within their boundaries (except in proximity to occupied structures), prohibit local jurisdictions from enacting gun ordinances more restrictive than state law, and ensure the right of citizens to carry guns in parks and preserves.

Last year, a law that would have allowed guns on college campuses was watered down and then ultimately vetoed by Gov. Jan Brewer. However, last month, state Sen. Ron Gould said he would introduce a new version of the bill during the 2012 session.

All of this dismays longtime supporters of stricter gun laws. “Anyone who wants a gun for any type of purpose can go to a gun show, knowing there will not even be the semblance of a gun check,” says Elliot Glicksman, a prominent Tucson attorney who specializes in representing crime victims.

Glicksman’s caseload is grim testimony to the extent of gun violence. “I deal with this stuff all the time,” he says, “and to me, it seems unbelievable that we live in a place where people really believe there should be no limit on who gets guns and what kind of guns they get.”

Other reform advocates have personally felt the impacts of gun violence. It was 30 years ago that Susan Agrillo’s sister was gunned down in Chicago during a botched mugging. Now a prosecutor with the Tucson City Attorney’s Office, Agrillo spent years working toward even minimal firearms control.

She says her efforts were blocked at nearly every step by the National Rifle Association. “They have a lot of money, a lot of lobbyists, and they influence our legislators.”

To Agrillo, the NRA’s clout overshadows public sentiment. “Most people want reasonable gun control,” she says, “and that’s been the case since I started doing this 30 years ago.”

Judging from the December Tucson gun show, that’s also likely to be the case for years to come. On this day, NRA volunteers are out in full force, renewing memberships and hustling raffle tickets for a $400, .40-caliber Taurus handgun.

Among those volunteers is Jim Coniglio, a retired electrical engineer, a weapons instructor and an NRA lifer. “When you have very strict gun controls such as in Washington, D.C., and New York City,” he says, “there’s more crime there with criminals having guns and people being defenseless.”

From that perspective, growing gun sales since Jan. 8 should surprise no one. “I think on Black Friday after Thanksgiving, they even set a record with gun sales to women,” Coniglio says.

To him, the logic driving that trend is a no-brainer. “Would you prefer to call 911—and wait for an hour, and maybe a cop will show up—as your wife is being attacked by some guy?”

Related Stories

Moving Forward

The victims of Jan. 8 and their loved ones vow to move on – but never forget

Recovery in Process

After a devastatingly bad day, the staff of Gabrielle Giffords went back to work

Illness and Ignorance

Local mental-health services these days are trying to do more with less in funding

Not in a Vacuum

Arizona and Tucson need to shoulder some of the blame for the Jan. 8 shootings

The Heroes

We catch up with some of the people who made Southern Arizona proud on Jan. 8, 2011

6 replies on “Guns Galore”

  1. Mr. Vanderpool, I think you are missing the point here. People are buying firearms in record numbers not in spite of acts like the shooting of Rep. Giffords, but because of them.

    It’s not a fear of having to buy something before it gets ‘taken off the shelves’ as you put it that’s driving this increase. We saw that when Mr. Obama was elected, and it was a short duration blip. Instead it’s acts like the shooting of Ms Giffords that force individuals to the realization that they are responsible for their own protection, and that a firearm is the ideal tool for that task.

    The police couldn’t protect a member of Congress in a crowded public venue. Nor could all the illogical ‘gun control’ laws that force law-abiding citizens to jump through legal hoops while doing nothing to prevent the criminal from being armed.

    The simple fact is that for years gun owners did react as described. Any shooting incident seemed to be fodder for the professional anti-gun lobby to wave their hands and clamor hysterically for more laws to ‘make us all safe’. The good news is that those days are over.

    The tide is turning, and Americans are rediscovering firearms for sport and for defense. We also have a large group of young military men and women re-entering civilian life after handling firearms (those scary black ‘assault weapons’ no less) for years. These folks have used firearms on a daily basis, and will be impossible to terrorize or confuse by the mere mention of ‘guns’.

    Americans are realizing that they have been lied to about guns by these anti-rights groups. The laws they proposed in the past have turned our cities, our schools and our parks into free-fire zones for criminals.

    As more Americans become firearm owners again, you will see not only this increasing trend in sales, but a repeal of the convoluted system of anti-gun rights laws put into place over the last 50 years.

    In short, this increase is the result of a long uphill struggle by a core group of advocates that is finally starting to bear fruit. The stigma around firearms that has been pervasive since the 70s is disappearing, and it looks like the ranks of American firearms owners will continue to grow from here on out.

  2. Look out for another Guns on Campus bill sponsored by Ron Gould. Brewer says she’ll sign it. Some very dangerous ideas come out of our legislature pushed by the NRA.

  3. I don’t know what would have happened that day if there had been more guns – no one does. But I do know what would have happened if there had been just one LESS gun that day.

  4. New York City has strict licensing and registration of handguns and a ban on assault weapons and guess what, it is one of the safest large cities in the USA. Please get the facts straight about NYC. Good gun laws work!

  5. @SafeinNYC: I think your attribution of gun control providing safety in NYC is effectively disproven by the experiences of Chicago and Washington D.C. Chicago had a handgun ban and Illinois has licensing and registration, yet Chicago is one of the most dangerous cities for gun violence in the country. In D.C. they also had a complete ban on handguns and functional firearms in the home, which was overturned by the Heller decision – whereupon gun crime in D.C. DROPPED.

    As for the article, it required more of a response than a mere comment: http://tinyurl.com/7l6qqjr

  6. Wow, I suspect Scott Zike didn’t know you were planning on writing a poorly thought out hit piece full of exaggerations, misconceptions, fabrications and outright nonsense. I’m sure he’ll be just as happy to speak to a member of the press after this. Yellow journalism at it’s finest.

    Mr Vanderpool, you clearly know very little about firearms. Please stick to the local blotter or what ever you usually write and leave the technical, legal and ethical material to someone who understands it.

Comments are closed.