The Aftermath
Winner and losers from last week’s election
From what The Skinny knows as of our Monday deadline, about 21,000 provisional ballots in Pima County remained to be sorted through from last week’s election. In past years, about 80 percent of those have turned out to be valid votes, but it takes some time to sort through them, so the count isn’t likely to be completed until the time our Thursday edition hits the street, with the Board of Supervisors scheduled to approve the canvass on Monday, Nov. 21.
That said, the vast majority of the more than 397,000 ballots cast in Pima County have been counted and we can poke around the numbers to draw a few conclusions.
Among the biggest winners:
• U.S. Rep. Martha McSally may have squeaked by in 2014 by a mere 167 votes, but this year, she solidified her position in Congressional District 2 by beating former state lawmaker Matt Heinz with 57 percent of the vote, or more than 40,000 votes.
This was no surprise. As a military veteran, McSally fits the district well and has worked hard on issues like saving the A-10, blocking plans to close the Cherrybell postal-sorting center and generally keeping up a high profile in the district. McSally has also been a very cautious politician rather than an ideological bomb-thrower.
On Election Night, before the returns started rolling in, McSally was talking about being one of the few members of Congress who managed to get anything passed in the last few years, even if it was generally uncontroversial legislation giving veterans a leg up in the Border Patrol hiring process or allowing WWII female pilots to be buried at Arlington National Cemetery.
But with Republicans now in control of both houses of Congress and the White House, McSally will have to make some tough decisions: Is she going to support House Speaker Paul Ryan’s plan to privatize Medicare? Will there be a replacement of Obamacare or just a repeal? Will people with pre-existing conditions go back to being unable to buy health insurance? Will she continue to vote in favor of banning Planned Parenthood from receiving federal healthcare dollars now that the GOP could make that a reality?
At this point, these are all questions without answers, as Republicans are still scrambling to figure out just how they are going to recreate America over the next four years.
• Low-income workers are getting a raise with the passage of Prop 206, which will boost the minimum wage to $10 an hour next year and $12 an hour in 2020. It’s one bright spot in a state where a Republican governor and Legislature are working to shift the tax burden from wealthy to poor.
• Democrat Pima County Supervisor Sharon Bronson fended off a challenge from Republican Kim DeMarco, who was backed by a well-funded independent campaign tied to car dealer Jim Click and countered by a pro-Bronson independent campaign funded by legendary land speculator Don Diamond. Bronson’s win leaves Democrats firmly in control of Pima County and allows Pima County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry to continue working on the economic-development efforts he’s been building.
“Pima County had some good news,” Bronson said after the election. “We will stay the economic-development course and I look forward to working with (Republican Supervisor-elect) Steve Christy so we can build bridges, both literally and figuratively.”
• Republican Todd Clodfelter, after making two previous attempts to win a House of Representatives seat in Tucson’s Legislative District 10, finally appears to have triumphed. Clodfelter was leading incumbent Rep. Stefanie Mach by 569 votes as of our deadline. (Political newcomer and Democrat Kirsten Engel was leading both candidates for the other seat in the district.) Clodfelter’s previous runs helped him build up some name ID and being the only GOP candidate let him run a successful “single-shot” campaign. This is the third election cycle in a row where a Republican candidate managed to win a House seat in a Democratic district; in 2012, it was Ethan Orr, who lasted just one term; in 2014, it was Chris Ackerley, who lasted just one term;
• Republican Mark Napier overcame a countywide registration disadvantage to unseat Sheriff Chris Nanos, who was appointed to the gig last year and found himself scrambling to handle a volatile mix of scandals and unhappy deputies.
• Sen. John McCain ended up with a 13-percentage-point win over Democrat Ann Kirkpatrick, giving Arizona’s senior senator six more years in D.C. Now we’ll see whether how President-elect Donald Trump deals with McCain and whether McCain continues to fall in line with the new administration or whether he spends what is likely a final term rediscovering his maverick ways.
• Democrat Tom O’Halleran easily knocked down Republican Paul Babeu in Congressional District 1,but will be serving as a member of the minority party. Something tells us O’Halleran’s ethics plan will be out of place when Trump assumes the presidency with both houses of Congress behind him.
• TUSD Board members Mark Stegeman and Kristel Foster are both headed back to new terms, meaning their obvious hatred for each other will continue to play out in public for the next four years. But Cam Juarez was unseated by political newcomer Rachael Sedgwick, who managed to avoid being targeted or supported by the various independent expenditure efforts campaigning on behalf of different candidates.
Among the biggest losers:
• Pima County Supervisor and Queen Nut Ally Miller: Miller won reelection, but her grand plan to seize control of the Board of Supervisors went down with Bronson’s win over DeMarco. Miller will once again spend the next four years making up conspiracy theories, undermining economic-development initiatives, terrorizing anyone unlucky to work on her staff and searching for bugs in her office.
• Pot smokers: With Prop 205 going down in defeat, it will likely be at least four years before opponents of prohibition come back with another effort to decriminalize the use of marijuana. While efforts to allow weed for medical or recreational use passed in half a dozen states last week, Arizona bucked the trend by rejecting Prop 205 by roughly 3 percentage points. Credit a well-funded and aggressive opposition campaign in Arizona, along with those potheads who believed it was a better strategy to keep dope completely illegal (unless you have a med card) rather than lift the threat of a felony conviction.
• Democrats at the Arizona Legislature: On Election Night, a jubilant state Sen. Steve Farley announced that Democrats were headed to 15-15 tie with Republicans in the Arizona Senate. But Farley’s chickens didn’t all hatch; as of The Skinny’s deadline, Republicans were hanging onto 17 seats in the state Senate and (with Mach’s loss here in Tucson) had only picked up one seat in the House of Representatives, so Republicans continue to hold control of the statehouse.
This article appears in Nov 17-23, 2016.

“…and Queen Nut”
That must make Nintzel the King Pissant. Totally unprofessional and quite immature, a liberal’s liberal without a point.
Bottom line? Expect exactly what we are used to. Pot, potholes, and piss poor public schools. Perfect.
Wow, the Troll Train rolled in early today.
The first one, known by the locals as Wrong, Again…rolled in at 3:53 am. It’s always best to get your trolls out that early/late (depending how you live your life) before your mama stomps downstairs to the basement and chews your lazy ass out for not having a job yet…and not having a job ever.
The next one, driven by the troll named Larry McNeil…rolled in at 6:53 am. Not near as bumpy of a ride, yet still uncomfortable and agitating.
Get on the train! Better yet…seek out a sensible mode of transportation.
Thanks. It’s funny that everybody you can’t find common ground with is a troll, but you are the only one that doesn’t comment on the article. You comment on the commenters.
Troll-def.
At times, the word can be abused to refer to anyone with controversial opinions they disagree with.[17] Such usages goes against the ordinary meaning of troll in multiple ways. Most importantly, trolls don’t actually believe the controversial views they claim. Farhad Manjoo criticises this view, noting that if the person really is trolling, they are a lot more intelligent than their critics would believe.
Is that what’s got you down?
Ex Sheriff Nanos now becomes the legacy of Clarence Dupnik. Can they bring down Huckleberry?
We can only hope. The man is a total asshole.
Oh Sheet Larry!
The train is coming through again…better get your best troll game ready.
It always rolls through here 7 minutes before the hour.
Please, come up with something better than your last post!
Otherwise, you’re not serving your purpose as a conductor of the Troll Train.
Oops! Boarding time.
One of the authors of Prop 205, off the record, blames the loss on the fact that they got too greedy, writing it to give the current medical dispensaries and growers very close to a monopoly in the recreational market.
That is why I almost voted against it. He said that they will modify it next go-around to open it up.
I do not hate Kristel Foster, and I guess that few persons who actually watch board meetings have formed that impression. In an ideal world, such charges would be accompanied by evidence. I strongly disagree with the way that the self-identified “board majority” has run TUSD, but that is a policy not a personal statement.
Mark, why not invite Nintzel to a board meeting? Then we can see how he reports what he sees and hears.
Is he usually there? I’m not sure why he thinks Foster hates you. Was it something she said?
I do not recall ever seeing Nintzel at a board meeting, but maybe it happened long ago. (Of course, many persons watch the video stream who rarely attend in person.) In general, I think this portrayal (I hate Foster, I am a Sith Lord, pick your flavor) comes out of a conversation that runs through a mostly closed political circle of people who rarely if ever talk to me. It is fed by persons who see me (accurately) as a threat to the status quo. Except for MAS, which was a serious issue, it rarely refers to any actual TUSD issues. That is probably because most of the public would agree with my positions on the issues, so to reduce my effectiveness the status quo must turn it into a conversation about personalities. But the people who really care about improving TUSD should pay more attention instead of simply whipping the froth.
As for Foster’s viewpoint, others can speculate about that. I periodically renew a longstanding offer to meet her for a cup of coffee, but after more than three years I am not optimistic that it will ever be accepted.
Then just keep up the good work. We appreciate what you are trying to do for the children.
TUSD needs to improve in many areas. I’m optimistic that the new governing board will make progress in reversing the downward trend.
I’m also pleased that Dr. Stegeman will return to ask more of the hard questions the public needs to have answered.
Perhaps, with the addition of Rachael Sedgwick to the board, the consensus will trend toward more transparency and accountability. That seems to be what the voters wanted.