All those hipster lists about best cities and all the cool restaurants and shopping areas—well, yada, yada. They’ve missed pointing out what know in Tucson, our libraries rule and we have some amazing librarians that seem to love dishing out those books and community in Tucson, too. You know who you are, and yep, we love you.
Anyway, if you feel the same, perhaps you should take some time this weekend calling our lovely state lawmaker and ask them as nicely as you can to stop HB 2379, introduced by Republican Justin Olson.
From our lovely librarians:
The bill would put levy caps on library districts and seriously impact budgets. … The bill will likely go to Rules, caucus, Committee of the Whole, and possibly a floor vote in the House next week.
Librarians and advocates should email and call their legislators expressing opposition to HB 2379: special districts; secondary levy limits. AzLA opposes HB 2379, a bill that places levy caps on Library Districts. Under the bill, levy growth for library districts is restricted to the same percentage growth as the annual increase in the county’s primary levy limits (maximum of 2 percent plus new constructions, annually).
◾Ask your library advocates, friends and staff to email your Representatives by Monday, February 3rd, at 5:00pm. Legislative contact info: http://www.azleg.gov/alisStaticPages/HowToContactMember.asp
◾Whenever possible, please copy or forward AzLA Legislative Chair Brenda Brown (brenda.brown@chandleraz.gov) and and AzLA lobbyist Jessica Rainbow (jessica@pivotalpolicyconsulting.com) onthese e-mails
…
◾Follow-up with a call to make sure they received the email and offer to discuss the issue further
Talking points:
In the past six years similar bills have been introduced in the Arizona legislature, the bills attempted to remove local flexibility of library districts in rural Arizona.
Currently, library districts work with regional libraries to determine what resources are needed, then levies a property tax in order to meet those needs.
This year House Bill 2379 would remove that process and force Arizona library districts to conform to a limited funding method.
Please contact your legislators now to communicate the importance of a library district in your region, and ask them not to vote on legislation that would be disproportionately harmful to rural libraries because new construction is the only real generator of an increase in levy limit
Visit www.azleg.gov to findcontact information for your legislators.
What the Bill Does: HB 2379, Special Districts; Secondary Levy Limits would limit the Library Districts to raising their levy limit by a total of 2% plus new construction. We know that new construction has been down for all counties, including the urbans. But even as the economy improves, the rurals never see the kinds of increases for new construction.
The talking points: The Library Districts have such a low levy rate to begin with, a 2% increase generates such limited capacity that the benefit is negligible (any examples on how this directly impacts your library districts would help).
This disproportionately hurts rural libraries because new construction is the only real generator of an increase in levy limit. New construction in rural areas even in a good economy is a small bump in county valuations.
Property evaluations are still decreased around the state. As this impacts the counties it will disproportionately impact the libraries as they are tied to the county growth calculation in this bill.
Library Districts are good stewards of public funds. They are answerable to the voters through the County Supervisors. They have not abused their taxing authority and have not been the subject of taxpayer concern or complaint.
This is a very small issue for taxpayers, yet a critical one to the already beleaguered Library Districts. All Library Districts are cutting their budgets, laying off and eliminating staff, reducing hours and access to resources, along with all other state and local governments.
This would significantly limit library resources across the state.
HB 2379 would limit library district property taxes to an annual increase of 2% plus taxes on new construction in the district. If this limitation had been in place four years ago, library district revenues would have been cut by anywhere between 6% and 41%.
Libraries should not be arbitrarily limited by the state; resource levels should be locally-determined.
Libraries serve local needs, and should be controlled at the local level. They provide vital services to the citizens of rural areas, where growing populations create the need for additional library resources.
These proposals would dramatically increase pressure on Friends of the Library and other fund-raising groups.
If library district resources are cut, either the funding must be subsidized by other sources or services must be cut. Currently, library districts provide the following resources to help regional libraries:
◾Augment library materials budgets, allowing rural libraries to purchase books, newspapers and database resources.
◾Provide technical expertise, such as highly-educated librarians and library knowledge, to rural libraries.
◾Provide circulation and catalog systems to rural libraries, which allows libraries to organize their resources and share the resources of other libraries.
The Governor vetoed a similar bill three years ago.
· Governor’s veto stated that mandating these types of restrictions would affect counties inequitably in their efforts to respond to community needs. Rural counties in particular, who already have low existing levels, will be penalized with the statewide cap.
· However, she believes a system of limits could be in place if the varying county circumstances were taken into account. This unfortunately, is not addressed in HB 2379 and ATRA has not yet been willing to work together on reasonable legislation that is acceptable to all parties.
Every citizen of Arizona benefits from the services offered by libraries.
Libraries provide services that are valuable to every group and individual of rural Arizona, including:
◾Research: The research tools offered by libraries provide resources to teachers, students of every age, scholars, and anyone wanting to learn new skills, job training or information.
◾News and Information: Libraries subscribe to worldwide newspapers and periodicals that provide extensive knowledge which would otherwise not be available to Arizona’s residents.
◾Genealogy: While many online genealogy tools are far too costly for individuals to access on their own, libraries are able to provide the unique resource to the public.
◾Technology: Much of rural Arizona still has limited Internet and telecommunications resources. Libraries provide Internet access, fax machines and other valuable tools to residents.
◾Meeting Space: Libraries provide room for meetings and gatherings, which is a valuable resource particularly in rural Arizona. Girl and Boy Scout troops, 4-H groups, and senior citizen programs regularly take advantage of this public service.
This article appears in Jan 30 – Feb 5, 2014.

Keep our libraries strong and our people will be stronger for it! Stop HB 2379!
Shameful. This will have devastating effects on our communities.
The bill also affects jails and juvenile facilities, meaning that older jails can’t be replaced easily and that facilities can’t grow fast enough if the community grows as well. So would a county stop issuing building permits to a 2% increase annually as well? It would be a good idea.
Do the homebuilders know about this? Are they going to want to build homes where counties will have to release jail inmates early because of overcrowding? Does anyone want to live in such a place?
Also read Chuck Huckleberry’s memo on the Pima Co. Public Library site. Several branches would close and programs such as homework help, computer classes, and job help would end. This would have a ripple effect affecting even non-library users as these services help prepare people with skill needed to be able to join today’s workforce and in supporting our already strapped schools by supporting our communities kids. This is a knee-jerk bill with no consideration for the negative impact on our communities, businesses, and schools due to the cuts that will have to be made.
If you want to stop HB2379, I’ve got a petition here:
http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/dont-let-the-legislature?source=c.em.cp&r_by=1873804
If we get enough signatures, we can deliver it to legislators in person – a big pile of names sends a message that’s hard to ignore.
The memo written by Chuck Huckleberry outlining all of the branch and programming cuts can be found on the PCPL website at library.pima.gov.
There is also a petition on moveon.org titled Don’t let the Legislature slash finding for libraries! Signatures (according to the creator) will be delivered to the AZ House, AZ Senate and to Gov. Brewer.
The libraries sure have changed since the old days, they’ve got scanners and self-check-outs and even vending machines inside! Much, much, more of a pleasure to check out books, which I do frequently. However, they are also offering ebook check-outs online . . . I’m kinda an environmentalist, and would like to see libraries go electronic, of course we’ll still need libraries for the community services and such, but perhaps going to ebooks would save a lot of money? Maybe for those who can’t afford an ebook reader/computer, libraries could let folks rent these devices for a very small fee, or perhaps for free. Eventually books will be novelty items:
http://money.cnn.com/2013/10/08/technology…
Write your legislators, in order to persuade them or to provide evidence of support for killing this awful bill. It’s easy: address to first initial, last name @azleg.gov. E.g., eorr@azleg.gov. In greater Tucson area he’s the only one who’d be under pressure from House leadership to support the bill. While there may be effort to amend it, I suspect there’s no way to make it positive.
How much funding do the local library districts get from the state?
And why does a Mesa legislator give a fuck what happens in Pima County?
@Arthur, ebooks cost libraries huge amounts of money and are not at all economical. They also present a challenge because many library users don’t know that ebooks are already available through most public libraries and they don’t know how to access them, which means libraries need to dedicate even more staff time and money to training patrons on them. And the cost of ebook collections (and even collection development itself) is prohibitive, because publishers are levying ridiculous restrictions on checkout periods, lifespan of books, and even whether frontlist books are available at a reasonable time or whether you can’t get them until years after publication. What might cost you $5.99 as an ebook on Amazon can cost $30 or more for a library to own the same thing. If you want to see your library get more ebooks, I strongly encourage you to write to OverDrive and the major publishers and ask them to stop treating libraries so badly when libraries have been so good to them for decades.
@Hannah Gomez– I overheard a sales person at the Nook counter in my Barnes & Noble tell a potential customer that if she needed help with learning how to use the Nook, or had technical issues, she could just go to any public library, where the staff would help her figure it out. Pretty slick for B&N! Just outsource your technical support to the public library at no cost to yourself! Apropos to this discussion, this is just another example of how a myriad of people and institutions expect to extract all kinds of support and services from the library but generally don’t want to pay for them. HB 2379 is either a misguided attempt to get a rein on government spending or a conscious effort to kill the library. Either way, it’s bad legislation.
We have almost 6000 signatures. Please sign it to help save our libraries and our future.
http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/dont-let-the-legislature?source=c.em.cp&r_by=1873804