Here’s a great tip for folks who want to look like generous parents in their friends’ eyes without spending a dime. Go into your children’s room and take away a few of their most expensive toys. Then when Christmas rolls around, wrap up the toys and give them back to your kids. Be sure to put a picture of the “gifts” on the annual Christmas card you send out to impress your friends.
Where did I get this great idea, you may ask. From Governor Ducey and Republican legislators, of course. Look at the JTED funding bill just passed by the lege and signed by the governor. Last year, they took away $30 million dollars in JTED funding. This year they gave back $29 million. And they want us to believe this shows they support education. Look at Proposition 123. In 2009, they took away more than $300 million a year in education funding. Now they want to give 70 percent of it back, mostly from money that already belongs to the students. And Ducey expects to be congratulated for his generosity.
When I saw the battle between Arizona’s Senate and House Republicans over bragging rights for restoring the JTED funding, I almost ignored it. Typical election year posturing, I thought, nothing to see here. But this fight was unusually heated. When the Senate made a correction to the House bill, which made it a Senate bill, the House Republicans were apoplectic. “We want the credit! We demand the credit!” they screamed. So near they end of SB 1525, they added a section saying, “Restoring funding to JTEDs and implementing accountability measures to the programs was an important priority of members of the Arizona House of Representatives.” And they took what is, so far as I know, the unprecedented step of putting the names of its 56 supporters in the bill—which, I should add, includes the names of Democrats as well as Republicans.
Why so much fuss about getting the primary credit for restoring JTED funds? Isn’t it enough to say you voted for it? Apparently not. The Arizona voters have said education is a top priority, and they’re even willing to raise taxes to increase funding. A survey of CEOs indicates they think our education system is one of the main stumbling blocks to economic growth, more important than taxes and regulations. The only thing that’s more important to Republicans than appearing pro education is not spending any more on education than they absolutely have to. So they’re hit on a solution. Take credit for adding JTED funding when in fact you’re simply restoring the money you cut, less a million dollars. Take credit for adding $3.5 billion over ten years to education funding, when in fact you’re following a court order to restore voter-mandated money to education, less 30 percent, and using money that doesn’t come out of the state budget. When Ducey pats himself on the back for Proposition 123, he’s always sure to add, “And we didn’t raise taxes to do it.” That’s the point: pretend to spend more money on education but be sure not to add a penny in state taxes.
Maybe it’ll work, I don’t know. Maybe the illegal 2009 education money grab is ancient history that no one cares about. Maybe restoring JTED funds you voted to take away a year ago makes you a hero. If I were the state Democratic party or a Democratic elected official, I’d be doing what I could to make sure people know the Republicans aren’t advocates for public education. They’re not going the extra mile for our children. They’re only giving back some of what they took away. I’d be saying, “Show us some new education funding.”
BONUS DUCEY BACK PATTING UPDATE: This morning I received a bulk email from Ducey’s office congratulating him for signing the JTED restoration bill, giving him credit for “adding significant, real dollars to K-12 education” and thanking the legislators “for working swiftly and in good faith to put our kids first.” Remember, it was his budget proposal that cut JTED funding last year, and it was his idea to restore only a third of the funding—$10 million a year over three years—and only if businesses matched the funds. The only reason Ducey caved was because the legislative Republicans and Democrats got together and created a veto-proof majority to restore the $30 million — actually $29 million, but who’s counting? Ducey’s entire email is below.
Hello,
In January, I stood in front of a joint legislature to deliver my priorities for this session – and key among them was a strong focus on career and technical education.
Now, following a bipartisan – unanimous – vote in both chambers, we are one step closer to providing vital support for thousands of Arizona students while keeping a structurally-balanced budget.
This victory is a high testament to what I’ve said since the beginning – we can be responsible with our budget while adding significant, real dollars to K-12 education.
Over the past month, I’ve traveled the state corner to corner. I’ve met with education leaders, teachers, principals, parents and students. They share this commitment to ensuring that all Arizona students are prepared for life after high school graduation – whether college or career.
To them, and to all Arizonans, I’m proud to say that the plan I signed today delivers. I thank our legislators – especially Speaker David Gowan and President Andy Biggs – for working swiftly and in good faith to put our kids first.
Thanks,
Doug
This article appears in Feb 18-24, 2016.

Love your allegory, David. Unlike others you have tried (e.g. TUSD as a big, unwieldy old ship, hard to steer) this one is entirely apt. Ducey with JTED is just like a kid who took his kids’ toys away and then gave them back to them, shopping around PR photos of the re-gifting and trying to present himself as a generous, well-intentioned parent. And I congratulate you for continuing to speak honestly and effectively about the fact that Prop 123 is a bad deal.
But I will say this: when you write, “Maybe it’ll work, I don’t know. Maybe the illegal 2009 education money grab is ancient history that no one cares about. Maybe restoring JTED funds you voted to take away a year ago makes you a hero. If I were the state Democratic party or a Democratic elected official, I’d be doing what I could to make sure people know the Republicans aren’t advocates for public education,” what I mainly think of is the position of all those in 2014 who knew that re-electing the TUSD Board majority would be a disastrous choice for the district, and who wrote, some of them at length and to no good purpose in these comment streams trying to help get the word out to the public that these people and their hired henchman a.k.a. boss and master were no more progressives than our state level officials are generous supporters of public education.
Doesn’t feel very good, does it, David, watching politicians lie to the public when you know better, and knowing that with the electorate (and the campaign war chests) configured the way they are, there’s a very slim chance of an upcoming election having a result that won’t have damaging consequences to vulnerable populations like the children in our schools?
And perhaps, when you get too upset about Ducey and his lies and propaganda, you should remind yourself of something you said in 2014 to people who were concerned about lies being circulated by some of your friends. In politics, if you don’t like seeing how the sausage gets made, stay out of the kitchen.
So stay out of the kitchen, David Safier. To use another of your favorite expressions, why get a “case of the vapors” over the same kinds of mendacious political behavior you have made excuses for yourself, when your allies have engaged in it?
The two comments above illustrate
A) Why Arizona voters keep electing the same ‘leadership’
B) Why said leadership barely bothers to cover up scandal and this kind of spin anymore
“Yeah, but….” is no way to engage in participatory democracy and promote good governance.
It would be refreshing to see fellow Arizona conservatives take a conservative, measured approach and actually start holding Republican state officials accountable for a change. It is possible to do that and still be mad at Obama/Democrats/whoever at the same time. Governor Ducey’s email about JTED speaks volumes about how much he thinks his core constituents are paying attention.
I’m having trouble making sense of comment #3. To those who have been following the comment streams on Safier’s pieces for the past two years, it is pretty clear that the first two comments were written by those on the left, not by “conservatives.” Try reading the Three Sonorans blog some time to understand the perspective of those concerned with social justice who don’t like certain aspects of Safier’s commentary.
Holding someone who purports to be scandalized by Ducey’s lies accountable for the fact that he has excused the same himself when he was defending his own political allies is in fact an excellent way to engage in participatory democracy and promote good governance. It is asking Safier to hold himself to a higher standard than he typically does when he reports on his own side of the aisle. Perhaps if, for the next eight months, he actually defends the standards he implies he upholds in pieces like this, we’ll end up with better results for the November 2016 elections than we did for those that took place in November 2014. We don’t need another two years of Sanchez-Grijalva-Foster-Juarez running TUSD any more than we need more of Ducey and his ilk running the state.
Is the left making itself crazy(er)?
We’re getting ready to move to Tucson from Madison WI. Reading this makes me feel as though we’ll be right at home given the same tactics used by our Republican Gov Scott Walker and his cronies
You should consider moving to Vermont.
No, No, No, David, You make it sound like that is the kind of crap they are pulling on us.
I have a problem, my kids don’t live at home anymore, no precious toys. I wonder if I pulled my wife’s best summer clothes and gave them back to her next winter, what my funeral would be like?
OMG! Why didn’t I ever think of that. Hmm. Guess it’s not too late to start with the grandchildren, huh?