Horror in the Ice 

Making 'The Thing' a prequel to the '82 film was a brilliant idea—but the execution isn't so great

The latest adaptation of The Thing has its share of good scares and decent-enough performances—but the film spazzes out toward the end, resulting in an admirable yet disposable experience.

It was a great idea to take John Carpenter's brilliant 1982 version of John W. Campbell Jr.'s short story "Who Goes There?" and make a prequel. Fans of Carpenter's masterpiece might recall that film's beginning, in which a couple of crazy Norwegians showed up at an American scientific outpost in the Antarctic and frantically shot at a seemingly harmless dog. Kurt Russell's chopper pilot eventually wound up at the Norwegian camp, where he saw some scary things ... and brought something back with him. This film tells the story of what happened to those Norwegians before Russell and his friends had their lives so rudely interrupted.

Simply remaking Carpenter's film would've resulted in something that couldn't possibly be as perfect as the '82 film. Carpenter was at the top of his game, and Rob Bottin's special makeup effects are now legendary. It's virtually impossible to compete with what these men did.

This version of The Thing draws much from Carpenter's vision in its look and sound. Therefore, in a way, first-time director Matthijs van Heijningen Jr. is being a bit of a copycat. Like the Thing, his film has absorbed the Carpenter flick and tried to replicate its tone, and in some ways, the movie is very much like Carpenter's. In others ... it's just not the same.

Mary Elizabeth Winstead plays Kate, a less-intense variation on Sigourney Weaver's Ellen Ripley from the Alien movies. Kate is an American scientist who winds up hanging with the Norwegians at their camp, where they are about to excavate what appears to be an alien life force from the ice. When the Thing breaks out and starts wreaking havoc, Kate's weapon of choice is, of course, a flamethrower.

The film follows the same path as Carpenter's film, with the Thing absorbing various members of the team—and leaving the viewer guessing about who has been infected. As in the Carpenter film, the team attempts to root out infected men in a pivotal scene that results in violent mayhem.

Since 1982, this thing called a "computer" has infiltrated movie special effects. Carpenter and Bottin used traditional, practical effects in their film, coming up with such movie awesomeness as the spider head and that razor-toothed mouth that bit the doctor's arms off.

Heijningen integrates CGI into some decent practical effects. However, I wish he'd left the computers out of it, because some pretty good ideas got polished up—and ruined—with gigabytes. The final Thing monster incarnation is hilariously terrible, featuring a key actor's giant face in its middle.

The good stuff includes a decent, disgusting autopsy on one of the Thing's many yucky forms. I also liked the moment in which Eric Christian Olsen's scientist had his encounter with the Thing, resulting in something that gave me the creeps.

The coolest thing in the movie happens during the closing credits, where Heijningen finds a way to link his film to the '82 movie. I won't give anything away, but it was neat enough to almost make me forgive the asinine final monster incarnation. Almost.

Winstead is a decent-enough performer, although the screenplay's attempts to make her a brainy, important scientist are silly. Apparently, her character was flown all the way to Antarctica at great expense to help excavate the monster. Her actual task: Nodding before somebody starts a drill. The rest of the time, she just stands around, looking worried.

Joel Edgerton and Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje (say that one three times fast!) play a pair of American chopper pilots who pick the wrong time to visit the Antarctic. Edgerton, like Winstead, is a capable performer, but is given relatively little to do.

The movie had its release date changed a few times, which is usually an indicator of production problems. Perhaps the director had something a little more minimalist in mind, and Universal made him blow things up with more CGI. For whatever reason, the production seemed to have problems, and the solutions may've taken the movie in the wrong direction. The final cut seems to have multiple moviemaking sensibilities clashing within.

The Thing is better than most other recent attempts to revive '80s horror icons. It's just not good enough to be considered a worthy endeavor, and I imagine it will be the last Thing movie we'll get for 30 years or so.

The Thing
Rated R · 103 minutes · 2011
Official Site: www.thethingmovie.net
Director: Matthijs van Heijningen
Producer: Marc Abraham, Eric Newman, J. Miles Dale, David Foster, Lawrence Turman and Gabrielle Neimand
Cast: Mary Winstead, Joel Edgerton, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje, Trond Seim, Ulrich Thomsen, Eric Olsen, Jorgen Langhelle, Jan Roise, Stig Henrik Hoff, Kristofer Hivju, Paul Braunstein, Kim Bubbs, Jonathan Walker, Jo Haavind and Carsten Bjornlund


More by Bob Grimm


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • Nun Sense

    The Loft screen’s a documentary about a Tucson nun’s experience with a hallucinogenic in the Amazon
    • Dec 10, 2015
  • Krazy Kaufman

    Charlie Kaufman delivers his mind-blowing cinema craziness in animated Anomalisa
    • Jan 28, 2016

What others are saying (10)

Boise Weekly The Projector: Movies opening on Oct. 14 Steve Martin, Jack Black and Owen Wilson search for rare birds, Kenny Wormald searches for freedom to cut loose, Vera Farmiga soul-searches for her faith, Ludivine Sagnier searches for success by way of an unscrupulous mentor in Kristin Scott Thomas and The Thing searches for host bodies. It's all at the movies. by Garrett Horstmeyer 10/14/2011
Arkansas Times 'The Thing': a serviceable homage Prequel builds upon plot of original cult classic. by Sam Eifling 10/19/2011
NUVO Ed reviews 'The Thing' If you haven't seen the other versions of this sci-fi thriller, do yourself a favor and check those out instead of this dreck. by Ed Johnson-Ott 10/14/2011
7 more reviews...
East Bay Express The Thing Norwegians would. You shouldn't. by Kelly Vance 10/12/2011
Portland Mercury Imitation Cheese The Thing: Matthijs van Heijningen Jr. is no John Carpenter. by Erik Henriksen 10/13/2011
The Coast Halifax Not The Thing of beauty Horror prequel plays it too obvious, lacks mystery by Matthew Ritchie 10/16/2011
Creative Loafing Atlanta Hollywood Product: The Thing Prequel replicates DNA of John Carpenter's original by Curt Holman 10/14/2011
Colorado Springs Independent Opening this week The Big Year, Footloose and other film events around town. 10/13/2011
Colorado Springs Independent Cold dead hands: The Thing There's no mystery in The Thing. Even the guessing game of who is and isn't human is lackluster. by Anders Wright 10/13/2011
Chicago Reader Every day is Halloween The surprising influence of John Carpenter's film scores from the 70s and 80s on current electronic dance music by Miles Raymer 08/08/2012

The Range

The Lantern Fest: Get Your Shine On

Fill Up On Beer, Bands and Brats at 4thtober Fest

The Weekly List: 26 Things To Do In Tucson In The Next 10 Days

More »

Latest in Cinema Feature

  • Celluloid Celebration

    Film Fest Tucson partners with area community groups to highlight Old Pueblo film and culture
    • Oct 20, 2016
  • Account-Man?

    The Accountant may seem crazy odd, but it’s also surprisingly good
    • Oct 20, 2016
  • More »

Facebook Activity

© 2016 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation