http://www.tucsonweekly.com/TheRange/archives/2013/03/19/sb-1432-because-if-our-toilets-arent-sacred-what-is Comments On: SB 1432: Because If Our Toilets Aren't Sacred, What Is? by Mari Herreras en-us Copyright 2013 Tucson Weekly. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Tucson Weekly readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Tucson Weekly. dmendez@tucsonweekly.com (Tucson Weekly Webmaster) Sat, 25 May 2013 00:00:01 -0700 Sat, 25 May 2013 16:15:00 -0700 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Posted by dziga]]> Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:27:14 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by Sharon Curtis]]> Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:51:21 -0700 Tucson Weekly
C. SUBSECTION B OF THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO A PERSON WHO ENTERS A PUBLIC RESTROOM, BATHROOM, SHOWER, BATH, DRESSING ROOM OR LOCKER ROOM AND WHO IS OF A DIFFERENT SEX THAN THAT INDICATED ON THE SIGN IF THE PERSON IS ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.
Posted by Alex]]> Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:31:27 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by Alec M. Swanson]]> Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:06:06 -0700 Tucson Weekly
>You REALLY want your young daughters in the restrooms with TG folks that still have their >male junk?

Ever heard of a Female to Male trans person? Not cuties like Chaz Bono, no I mean Grizzly Adams types.
Posted by April Gendill]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:32:45 -0700 Tucson Weekly
As well as the Band of Sisters who inevitably duck into the shorter lined men's room where they can get some satisfaction.

Now they will be forever designated as common criminals.
Just what our overcrowded jails need.
Posted by Tom Mahon]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:44:31 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by Bill Randal]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:43:50 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by oldman]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:44:49 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by OMR]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:09:58 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by cempiremtn]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:57:25 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by Kristina Lorraine]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:54:41 -0700 Tucson Weekly
Oh boy.
Posted by Daniel Rivera]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:36:30 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by Rowan Frost]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:24:56 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by drluccia]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:09:24 -0700 Tucson Weekly I am thrilled for your brother. May all the blessing of the universe fall upon you both.
However, Many, many transpeople were born in states that will not alter a birth record.
Posted by April Gendill]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:26:07 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by 1776Redux]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:24:27 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by April Gendill]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:21:14 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by justsayin]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:56:22 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by DaSarge]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:19:12 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by crinkster]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:57:06 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by Kristie Cunningham]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:52:01 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by April Gendill]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:26:55 -0700 Tucson Weekly
The standard terms for this among the gender studies crowd, CAMAB and CAFAB (coercively assigned male/female at birth; or their less in-your-face cousins MAAB/FAAB) also reference sex, not gender.

Maureen, I do agree with you that the erroneous process of people taking sex as an absolute determinant of gender (or, more realistically, failing to make the distinction in the first place that they are separate things) starts at birth (or before if the sex is assigned prior to birth). Of course it's completely silly to talk about the gender of a infant/fetus that hasn't even developed self-awareness yet, but that's another issue...
Posted by Ellen Shull]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 04:45:18 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by Maureen Robinson]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:58:59 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by Common sense]]> Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:13:31 -0700 Tucson Weekly