<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Background Noise
    
      by Jim Nintzel</title>
      <link>http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Rss.xml?oid=3632291&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Background Noise
    
      by Jim Nintzel</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Tucson Weekly. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Tucson Weekly readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Tucson Weekly.</copyright>
      <webMaster>dmendez@tucsonweekly.com (Tucson Weekly Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:00:01 -0700</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:15:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Background Noise]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3647548]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3647548]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Aaron Johnson]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I agree that the strong arguments deriding the usefulness of background checks furthers the argument of requiring licenses for owning and/or operating firearms. But, skipping past discussion of the mess of federal, state and local confusion over what kinds and levels of restrictions legally or practically can or ought be made on the Second Amendment, and sliding around how licensing ownership requires widespread inspection of housing and other properties to actually effect a decrease in criminal or looney use of firearms, I think that firearms owners and possessors should be required to have gunsafes and be required to participate in serious training in possession and handling of weapons.<br>
  I believe that investment in maintaining and handling any weapons has been and is being frequently blown off.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=3647547">Aaron Johnson</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:52:21 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Background Noise]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3635431]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3635431]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Ann Pattison]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[It seems to me that anyone arguing that background checks are not feasible for sales of guns among individuals is actually furthering the argument for requiring a license to own and operate a gun. A background check could easily be part of the process of obtaining a renewable license to operate a gun (passing a short class covering safe operation and use would be an obvious addition).
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=3612583">Ann Pattison</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 12:17:43 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Background Noise]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3634839]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3634839]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[cody]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Gun control is not about controlling guns, its about controlling YOU.<br>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/31/joe-biden-gun-laws_n_2595379.html
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          cody]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 23:56:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Background Noise]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3633812]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3633812]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[AZPaul]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[One more thing, a co-worker of mine was refuse to be sold a gun, with a little research with the FBI, he found out his SSN was used to buy a gun in another state that was used in a crime. The FBI cleared him but they never notified him about it or removed it from his record even though a significant amount of time went by.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=3156892">AZPaul</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:41:09 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Background Noise]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3633808]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3633808]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[AZPaul]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Because they want to force me to pay a FFL dealer $25 so I can sell my gun to somebody else. Make it free and as long as I dont have to tell what kind it is, they got a deal.<br>
But because they do not force employers to use Everify why should I have to perform back ground checks?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=3156892">AZPaul</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:33:48 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Background Noise]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3633062]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3633062]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[TLN2]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[When my father passed away, I was 58. My mother (then 85, living in a doublewide trailer in Omak, Washington) would have had to pay approximately $400.00 for those guns.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          TLN2]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:03:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Background Noise]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3633050]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3633050]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[SW]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The reason why most gun owners see this a an infringement of their rights is because the law will be ineffectual on crime and therefore just a burden on taxpayers and gun owners. Most of us are for action that works.<br>
<br>
It makes NO sense to me whatsoever to focus our attention on a source of firearms where 1% (or less) of them were used in a crime.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          SW]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:43:43 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Background Noise]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3632948]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3632948]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[cempiremtn]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[When a Dealer calls in a Background check, they do not learn anything about the person personally, just a Yes or No or maybe, about if they can purchase a Firearm.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=3056182">cempiremtn</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:08:10 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Background Noise]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3632945]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3632945]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[cempiremtn]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The Feds could just "ALLOW" private citizens to access the same system that Licensed Dealers have to now, problem solved. All it does anyway is create a paper trail to trace the gun, "AFTER" a crime, the Feds do not go after the people who fail the Background Checks, IE " A Felon trying to buy a gun".
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=3056182">cempiremtn</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:02:15 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Background Noise]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3632930]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/background-noise/Content?oid=3632291&show=comments#3632930]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[nam6870vet]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Apparently no one in politics has heard of the Privacy Act, Fifth Amendment, Second Amendment or the multitude of Federal laws regarding firearm purchases that law enforcement chooses to ignore.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=2507709">nam6870vet</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:21:27 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



