http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/fewer-voices/Content?oid=3428474 Comments On: Fewer Voices by David Mendez en-us Copyright 2013 Tucson Weekly. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Tucson Weekly readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Tucson Weekly. dmendez@tucsonweekly.com (Tucson Weekly Webmaster) Tue, 21 May 2013 00:00:01 -0700 Tue, 21 May 2013 15:00:00 -0700 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss
after all these decades the staff actually feels like there history is one of utter then absolute failure- they think about all the parties and allthe narrow casting and student and other activities but the fact that what is not fantasy but has actually occured in other places neveer ever came even even close enough to occuring here is avoided.
Posted by ditto]]> Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:10:53 -0700 Tucson Weekly
It has a handpicked board that it's employee's have gamed the election system to maintain- I know I and may who turned in our names- and staff nor the board has any discretion, all names are to be put on the ballot, saw our names not being put on the ballots, and instructions to the accounting firm to destroy ballots as asap, and publish as little as possible about the 'tally.'

IT used to have a problem with the memorability of the channel numbers not being matched by there tunability- you could accidentally or not touch the 9 and hold it long enough or bounce it and watch it, or press the channel down button down once and find it as the first channel from set on if you did.

MOre importantly these channels where not in home movie quality- not in VHS quality, they used to be broadcast quality. Not just several, on memorable channel numbers, but like 4, 6, 9, 11, 13 etc, with even stereo when CBS didnt' bother to invest in equipment to allow that for viewers.
Posted by seeking penance having hope not dead yet]]> Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:44:52 -0700 Tucson Weekly Posted by chasbass.blogs]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:12:12 -0700 Tucson Weekly
Then they caved to Cox in the latest contract negotiations when THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO!!!

Don't buy into Cox's lame attempts to "greenwash" their way into our community with a few crumbs from their groaning table to get their name on every major Civic event while they ROB US BLIND FOR THEIR CRUMMY "service"!
Posted by ChetDude]]> Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:44:29 -0700 Tucson Weekly
Since they already "provide" 500 channels of sh*t for the masses, and are CONSTANTLY extorting more and more money for their "service" anyway (FOR MORE PROFITS!), their argument that they're trying to "hold costs down for the 'consumer'" is obvious bullsh*t!

My reaction to their latest robbery will be to cancel my Cox cable on July 1st with a complete explanation to their corporate "leadership" as to why!
Posted by ChetDude]]> Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:38:03 -0700 Tucson Weekly