<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Pointless Project
    
      by Bob Grimm</title>
      <link>http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Rss.xml?oid=3203206&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Pointless Project
    
      by Bob Grimm</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Tucson Weekly. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Tucson Weekly readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Tucson Weekly.</copyright>
      <webMaster>dmendez@tucsonweekly.com (Tucson Weekly Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:00:01 -0700</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:15:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Pointless Project]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3212986]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3212986]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[InCali]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Certainly everyone is entitled to their opinion. The "critics" are entitled to theirs and the public is entitled to think certain critics are sometimes snobs, wrong, and self serving.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=3211047">InCali</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:00:31 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Pointless Project]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3212954]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3212954]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Hang Yang]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I Agree.<br>
The "cool" in Lisbeth is too shallow, and that the United States version thinks that as long as she has some cool dragon tattoo and a punk makeup, reveals a point of pale sickly, fragile physique to wear a small a hoodie, coupled with sharp eyes, then people will be very happy to see this movie. This Lisbeth is far away from the one in the book.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Hang Yang]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:15:58 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Pointless Project]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3212887]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3212887]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[clare]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I liked them both the original and this remake but thats cos i think of them as different movies. I liked both female leads and whilst i am a fan of Daniel Craig, found him rather distracting playing role of middle aged journo whilst trying not to get sidetracked by his excellent physique and his swagger (which i love) which he just cannot lose tho sure he tried:)  Do agree that it would have played better if they had just set the story in America - it wouldn't have detracted from it and probably would have helped.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          clare]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:09:34 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Pointless Project]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3211048]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3211048]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[InCali]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The only thing that "flopped" was your review. Better luck in the future (The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo - $80M and counting).
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=3211047">InCali</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:07:28 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Pointless Project]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3210343]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3210343]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Mick]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I've read the books, watched the swedish version, and have watched this version. There really is no comparison, this version was vastly superior to the swedish version.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Mick]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:05:35 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Pointless Project]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3209151]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3209151]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Lee Bryant]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The original is better and rapace was a better actress in the role i to read the novels when they first came out and in my interpretation rapace's character nailed it.<br>
I agree with the review a waste of time you can even watch the original with an english dub if your that put out by the subtitles.<br>
Why on earth did steve zallian get a writers credit for something thats been scripted before and copied almost identical to the original with the exception of a couple of scenes?.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=3209150">Lee Bryant</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:35:32 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Pointless Project]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3205300]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3205300]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Tommy D]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I disagree. I thought this film was excellent, and I'm a fan of the book, first and foremost.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Tommy D]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 01:09:21 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Pointless Project]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3203834]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/pointless-project/Content?oid=3203206&show=comments#3203834]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[archcc]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Wrong. This is actually better than the Swedish version, it is however, darker and the 'major' sex scene is more violent.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          archcc]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:07:32 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



