<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Mailbag</title>
      <link>http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/mailbag/Content?oid=2634873</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Rss.xml?oid=2634873&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Mailbag</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Tucson Weekly. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Tucson Weekly readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Tucson Weekly.</copyright>
      <webMaster>dmendez@tucsonweekly.com (Tucson Weekly Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:01 -0700</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:30:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Mailbag]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/mailbag/Content?oid=2634873&show=comments#2638779]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/mailbag/Content?oid=2634873&show=comments#2638779]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I certainly agree that Boegle's restaurant reviews are devoid of style, but I think a far bigger problem is that he simply doesn't seem to know very much about food. He tells you what he liked and what he disliked, and why, but the reader never gets the sense that these reactions are rooted in any particular expertise, or even that they are informed by much experience or engagement with the culinary world.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:24:48 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Mailbag]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/mailbag/Content?oid=2634873&show=comments#2636909]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/mailbag/Content?oid=2634873&show=comments#2636909]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Gail H.]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Concerning Patricia McGrath's letter, my wife and I do extensive research on all issues and candidates that come up at election time. Many times the candidates we support at the Pimary level do not survive to run in the General elections.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=1819062">Gail H.</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:25:23 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Mailbag]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/mailbag/Content?oid=2634873&show=comments#2636539]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/mailbag/Content?oid=2634873&show=comments#2636539]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Pima Mujer]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[In LD 26, which supposedly prizes public education, the voters re-elected two people (Vic Williams and Al Melvin) who had terrible records of supporting public schools. The third vote getter, with no voting record, was a woman (Terri Proud) who believed there was massive waste in education funding and declared "Kids First" (whatever that means).
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=1576100">Pima Mujer</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:45:13 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Mailbag]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/mailbag/Content?oid=2634873&show=comments#2636446]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/mailbag/Content?oid=2634873&show=comments#2636446]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Parent X]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Amen, Patricia McGrath. Amen.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=1454972">Parent X</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 03:48:57 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Mailbag]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/mailbag/Content?oid=2634873&show=comments#2635453]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/mailbag/Content?oid=2634873&show=comments#2635453]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Scarpia, B]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Matt Welch of the Australian Tourism Centre doesn't read very carefully. The March 17th item, "Culinary Criticism" said:  "I watched from the audience as the former editor of a renowned food magazine trashed my writing—specifically, last week's review of Janos Wilder's Downtown Kitchen + Cocktails."
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/Profile?oid=1172793">Scarpia, B</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:26:30 -0700</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.tucsonweekly.com">Tucson Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



