What a coy and pointless rebuttal!!
Tom, your column about gun control thrilled me because someone actually knew what a gerund was! Therefore, I was disappointed you didn't simply quote the Second Amendment and parse it for its meaning. The sentence is a mess, but no matter how much one is itching to caress the oiled barrel of an assault weapon, it's absurd to ignore the introductory phrase, you know, the mention of a well-regulated militia.
There are no jobs on a dead planet....
RJ, where do you get your facts? Or, more to the point, how did you reach that conclusion? Those drugs don't cause shooting sprees! They might even have prevented some, given that they're used to TREAT severe mental illness.
Just love Hoffman's citing those assault-weapon toting anecdotes as proof. First, they sound suspiciously fictional--any proof these events ACTUALLY happened? And second, if they are real, two anecdotes don't prove a goddamn thing! C'mon, Jonathan, I thought as a conservative you were a notch above that cretin Charles Krauthammer, but now I'm not so sure.
Tucson Weekly |
7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 |
(520) 797-4384 |
Powered by Foundation