Recent Comments
Re: “Danehy”
So Tom, you are upset that someone would have the audacity to make critical comments about Obama's mamma, but prior to that you knock Romney's father for being rich.
I guess it is always OK to be envious of the wealthy.
Re: “Danehy”
Using Danehy logic as presented in this column and last week's column, Tom states that one cannot positively state that Loughner 'never' listened to conservative talk radio. We can also assume then, that we won't know if Loughner did or did not read left leaning publications like The Weekly. So, I can now opine that reading the Weekly is the cause of the rampage. Duh.
I also continue to enjoy Tom's hatred of Sarah Palin. I guess she is Tom's whipping boy (or girl) now that bashing GW Bush is finally falling out of fashion. Like a Pavlov dog, mention 'Sarah Palin' and Tom goes 'woof woof' with denigrating remarks.
© 2013 Tucson Weekly | 3280 E. Hemisphere Loop, Suite 180, Tucson AZ 85706 | P.O. Box 27087, Tucson AZ 85726-7087 | (520) 294-1200 | Powered by Foundation
Re: “Guest Commentary”
No sunshine from MsAzSunshine today!!
So, Martha McSally is not an expert on foreign affairs....well, she only taught at the George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies. Here is part of the mission statement - "....is a renowned international security and defense studies institute that promotes dialogue and understanding among the nations of North America, Europe and Eurasia."
I voted for McSally. I could not stomach the thought of voting for "Well, I will run to serve the rest of Gabby's term then I am done", Ron Barber.