doug 
Member since May 14, 2009


Stats

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Links to Me

Recent Comments

Re: “The New York Times is Telling the Story of How Tucson Became an 'Unlikely Food Star'

Excellent job by Edible Baja Arizona coordinating this visit by The New York Times!

11 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by doug on 08/23/2016 at 10:02 PM

Re: “Adios, Compadre

Wonderful job, Dan.

8 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by doug on 08/18/2016 at 7:49 PM

Re: “Guest Opinion

Nice datum point, C Note. The racists just can't acknowledge their complicity in this nonsensical law. Big props to Gabrielle Giffords for opposing SB 1070 on NPR this afternoon!

Posted by doug on 05/20/2010 at 11:15 PM

Re: “The Death of Josseline

Margaret Regan's intelligence, compassion, keen eye for detail and contextual depth, and wonderful writing is a gift to this community. The Tucson Weekly is incredibly fortunate she writes for the paper. Let's hope this is the first of several books to come. Congratulations for a fine achievement!

—Douglas Biggers

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by doug on 02/17/2010 at 9:14 PM

Re: “Guest Commentary

Thanks for sharing, Myrtle.

Posted by doug on 07/18/2009 at 12:21 PM

Re: “Guest Commentary

Here's the correct version of the Inside Tucson Business fictional story, as published in today's edition. The story by Joe Pangburn was a pathetic attempt to write a hit piece, with a primary source whose credibility is laughable.

Let's get some facts straight about Rialto Theatre's impending eviction

By Doug Biggers, special to Inside Tucson Business
Published on Friday, July 17, 2009

In the July 13 issue of Inside Tucson Business, I believe the story about the Rialto Theatre’s impending eviction from some of the spaces it uses was riddled with errors and was intended to promote a negative image of me and the Rialto Theatre.

As the former editor and publisher of the Tucson Weekly, I have no problem with stories that have a point of view. In fact, the notion that journalism should be objective is largely a fallacy. What is important, however, is to be certain that statements presented as fact are accurate. I don’t believe that happened in this instance.

Let me refute some of the comments in that article that were made by Paul Bear, former owner of the Rialto Theatre:

• Bear states the Rialto Theatre Foundation has requested the developers of a proposed downtown arts and entertainment complex convey the spaces in question at no cost.

Not true. We have consistently said the property should be conveyed to the Rio Nuevo District, owner of the Rialto Theatre, for fair market value. Developers Don Martin and Scott Stiteler, owners of the block, have previously agreed that the Rialto needs those spaces and they should be conveyed to the district. They are now unwilling to do so.

• There was no public outcry when the Rialto Theatre was evicted from these spaces when I owned the Rialto Block, according to the article.

I would argue that’s because by that point the Rialto Theatre had no real public support.

• Bear states that I had a “mental breakdown” and “went crazy one day and started evicting tenants.” Further, he states that I had “no plans, no permits.”

The statement about a breakdown is simply ludicrous, and borders on the libelous. In late 2003 the owner of the Rialto Block was a company called Congress Street Investors LLC. I had a minority interest in that company and was one of four managers. Congress Street Investors had permitted construction documents for rehabilitation of the second floor of the Rialto Building and was ready to proceed with construction. Consequently, the building was vacated with more than 90 days’ notice to prepare for impending construction. Unfortunately, the managers decided not to proceed but that was not my decision.

The rehabilitation of the Rialto Building has been an earnest pursuit of mine for the last seven years; unfortunately, I was never in position of outright control of the project and it slipped from owner to owner, none of which have moved forward. Downtown revitalization is complex, risky and fraught with many obstacles.

• Bear’s opinion that the Rialto doesn’t need these spaces is baseless.

The Rialto Theatre of today is a professional music venue operating at a much higher level than it was previously. In its July 20, 2009, issue, concert industry trade publication Pollstar released its mid-year rankings of Worldwide Club Venues and the Rialto Theatre ranks number 42 worldwide in ticket sales, blowing away major venues in top 10 markets across the United States. The Rialto Theatre is one of the top 50 club venues in the world.

In the last six months, the Rialto Theatre Foundation has engaged in intensive efforts to ensure the protection of a historic theater owned by the citizens of Tucson and arguably one of the few success stories of the trouble Rio Nuevo project.

Our efforts to negotiate in good faith with Mr. Martin and Mr. Stiteler have been extremely frustrating. Unfortunately, for reasons that are not readily apparent, Mr. Martin and Mr. Stiteler have chosen to punish the Rialto rather than seek a cooperative, amicable and mutually beneficial resolution that would truly be in the community’s best interest. We continue to hope for a change in the context of this conflict.

Douglas Biggers is executive director of the Rialto Theatre Foundation.

Posted by doug on 07/17/2009 at 9:19 PM

Re: “Rock The Council: Save The Rialto!

Good grief. The free beer offer was a joke.

Posted by doug on 07/08/2009 at 10:39 AM

All Comments »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.
 

© 2016 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation