How did a political story expressly not about Donald Trump launch a comment thread that is entirely about Donald Trump and his opponent? For Dems, the Trump campaign might be hard to turn away from. But for many of us Republicans, it's hard to watch.
Most of this year's state and local elections aren't all that interesting, but at least they offer a diversion from the disaster that is our presidential race,
I'll skip the lengthy inventory of Trump's glaring inadequacies and simply say McSally is doing the smart thing. I hope she continues holding off supporting Trump. The Vichy wing of the GOP will be remembered as such.
Very poor job of listing GOP objections. Left out the very high error rate the no-fly list is known for. Was that omission intentional? Come on, Mr. Nintzel, let's be truthful.
I expect we will need to excuse them for taking some of the pictures from afar. I can't envision Tucson journalists hugging the border along the crest of the Tule Mountains, for example. And will the 197th mile be particularly interesting? How about the 196th?
I'm not taking sides here because I don't have nearly enough of the facts, but I feel THMS Badger's response to Bess Jones was the cop out. Ms. Jones raised some of the same questions I had, and the questions are legitimate.
I have a feeling that there is indeed some fire behind all this smoke, but the insurgents could be doing a much better job of making their case. Teachers claim to teach "critical thinking." Under Common Core they'll be expected to do more of that. Here's a chance for our educators to demonstrate their own analytical skills in a fight that might be well worth fighting.
The allegations could be rooted in fact or merely in the subjective interpretations of a few. Subjectivity can't be completely eliminated, but so far it's mainly a he-said, she-said argument. Someone should see if numbers can help tell a story.
Okay, you must have touched MY inner nerd with this one. I liked it.
But that was a recap of history. Now are you ready to tackle a more serious contemporary language issue, one that amounts to a cancer growing on our language? I'm talking about the proliferation of the phrase "these ones" and "those ones" among Tucson's millenials. It's especially rampant among retail sales clerks who can't seem to grasp that our forebearers constructed the words "these" and "those" so we wouldn't need two words. (It's smart stuff like that which makes the assembly instructions in English on the barbecue grill or furniture furniture you just bought about one third shorter than the same instructions in Spanish or French.) These sales clerks aren't speaking English as a second language. They're as apt to be Anglo as Hispanic, and to have no discernible non-English accent. And they're degrading a language that was gifted to them by ancestors.
A misguided effort at satire. Kavanagh has initiated what ought to be the start of a serious conversation. We shouldn't be afraid to talk about the issues he's brought up.
Colleges and universities with high freshman enrollments and low graduation rates are using young people instead of developing them. U of A has been exhibiting this symptom for quite a while. No one should be ridiculed for trying to address it.
All Comments »
Tucson Weekly |
7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 |
(520) 797-4384 |
Powered by Foundation