This shows absolutely no understanding of what we do as public officials that represent a school district.
I'm sorry Foster/Grijalva machine. we pretty much know exactly what you do. And many of us want you to stop it.
This is the NUMBER ONE REASON to BUILD THE WALL.
This is what you need to know about the Grijalvas:
Mari, I really can't thank you enough for making my point for me. It's been 3 weeks now since you wrote how proud you are of your 15 year old son that he knows that President Donald Trump is a racist. A " fact " he no doubt learned from his mom. I challenged you on that asking what facts you have to base that on. I'm sure if you had any you would come back at me with both barrels. Instead nothing. Silence. That's because you don't have a shred of evidence that Trump's a racist. Unless it's something you heard on the View. I hope you're proud that you filled your young sons head with lies and misinformation.
This is why I love the Left . Confront them with facts and they turn tail and run. You can't beat me in the arena of ideas. Never have. Never will.
Just stay home and you will not die in the desert and committe the crime of being illegal!!!! Any question?
Strategically placed the wall will prevent the US from looting Mexico of indigenous animals. Over the last 50 years there have been over 200 species , basically stolen from Mexico by us. They must be captured and returned. We owe them that much.
We were visiting a local resort and found this place on Yelp! At first we weren't sure if we wanted to try it but the steady stream of happy faces coming out of it told us we would like it.
My 90 year old mom had a huge banana pecan pancake and added chocolate chips. It was the size of a medium pizza! The friendly waitress told her if she ate the whole thing the waitress would pay for it!
Mom tried but couldn't do it. I had the most amazing Reuben Omelette. The home fries are unique and a must have.
One of the staff was having a birthday and they brought everyone a piece of birthday cake!
Great comfort food, great service and fantastic prices.
A must for UA students and resort visitors alike.
Everyday I'm thankful my children have options other than TUSD.
Build the wall, prevent families from being separated. Do it for the children.
"...he talks to people until the last person leavesand he does it in Spanish,..."
Well, there are probably some positions available in Sonora.
A more relevant question would be, why not ask these people about the environmental impact, trash and trail cutting caused by illegal immigration. How about some perspectives on the Cumero fire, which burned over 2,000 acres just over the hills from Arivaca last year?
We obviously need more visible border security to discourage these people from crossing. We should also stop encouraging these dangerous trips by putting water and other supplies in the desert.
The Network for Public Education sent out an e-mail this morning urging the people on its contact list to work against the passage of HR610:
"HR 610, the School Choice Act, would eliminate the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which was passed as a part of Lyndon B. Johnson's 'War on Poverty.' Federal funds would be used instead to create 'block grants' to be used to 'distribute a portion of funds to parents who elect to enroll their child in a private school or to home-school their child.' It would also roll back nutritional standards for free lunches for poor children."
This is the alternative to insisting that public school districts be competently managed. If they cannot be competently and honestly managed, the nation will take -- and is taking -- a different path.
What lessons about the direction national policy should take can we draw from observing TUSD under the Sanchez administration?
**Under its current leadership, the district redistributed Title 1 funds to achieve an across-the-board reduction in class sizes. This had the effect of reducing class sizes by adding fully qualified, experienced and certified teachers in schools like University High School and Fruchthendler that serve primarily affluent students, while in many of the schools serving primarily poor students, the new teaching positions created by the initiative could not be filled. Since the district reduced class sizes, too many classrooms in low-SES schools have been staffed with under-qualified long-term subs whose labor the Sanchez administration then outsourced to the for-profit company ESI, reducing their wages and destroying their ability to qualify for benefits. Does this provide the public with a "case study" that supports maintaining the provisions of ESEA? The public could be forgiven for asking: if this is what happens to Title 1 funds in districts like TUSD, what is the point of the government granting them? They are not benefiting the students they are intended to benefit.
**Under its current leadership, the district began spending millions in desegregation funds that should be spent to benefit minority students in increased legal fees to try to get out from under its desegregation order. Leaving aside the question of whether these funds would be better applied in the classrooms to benefit students, let's look at what the probable result of getting out from under the desegregation order will be: the Arizona legislature will have an excuse ("They're no longer under court order!") to eliminate the funding supplement entirely. Is the loss of $60 million per year that could potentially be applied to benefit minority students and achieve greater integration too high a price to pay for TUSD's central administrators no longer having to deal with independent desegregation authorities asking questions about how these funds are being applied? I guess it would depend on who you ask: the parents of minority students or the central administrators in TUSD, who will continue to receive inflated salaries and bonuses whether or not the district continues to levy desegregation taxes on its residents and business owners.)
**Are the best interests of poor children being served in a public district system where the Superintendent takes home nearly $500K a year and gives $10K bonuses to members of his central administrative cabinet while the district hoards 301 money meant for teacher bonuses in the districts' bank accounts and teachers leave the district and / or the profession because the working conditions in TUSD are so poor and / or they cannot put food on the table for their families with their shockingly low salaries and lower-than-they-should be bonuses? Half way through this school year, there were still more than 100 teaching positions the district had not been able to fill. Considering the district's inability to apply the funds available to it in ways that result in its classrooms being uniformly and reliably staffed with qualified educators, how do we then make the case to the public that it would not better serve students to be given the option of enrolling elsewhere, as the federal legislation under discussion proposes to do?
Whatever decisions are made about TUSD's leadership in the near term, the community should be considering these questions and keeping in mind that while the public observes a district enrolling 50,000 students systematically and persistently failing to offer quality services to minorities and the disadvantaged, many of the legitimate arguments for maintaining federal education laws and policies like ESEA are being effectively undermined.
Think of all the lives the wall will destroy.
But anyone with half a brain knows, the advice given by What, Again is the best advice to avoid.
Unless you are the same caliber of moron that What, Again is.
Wow! It's so refreshing to have yet another piece of education coverage from the Weekly that tells the Grijalva/Foster story (NOT). What the h has happened to this newspaper? I get it--bought by outsiders, decreasing budget, etc. etc. etc. but the education coverage on TUSD is all only from one direction--does anyone else notice? Stephanie Boe got you on speed dial or what?
Think about all the jobs on both sides of the border will be lost if the wall is built.
Think of all the lives the Wall will save.
Tom, you couldn't have spent much time in L.A. to come away with the impression that you noted, because L.A. drivers are models of decorum compared to Tucson drivers, thanks largely to much higher car insurance premiums and lots of brake-checking scamsters eager to exploit the tort laws. Climate, altitude and geography certainly contribute to the current presence of both Tucson and Phoenix at the top of the list for "most aggressive drivers in the country." I suspect another culprit may be that SO MANY Tucsonans apparently insist on working an 8am-5pm schedule, which shouldn't be necessary (and which science has recently found NOT to be optimal). Either drivers enjoy the experience of sitting in bumper-to-bumper traffic, or employers are inflexible about working hours. Hey, there's a great subject for a journalistic investigation! The Weekly still does those, right?
Who the man
Very cool love the production great stuff
Tucson Weekly |
7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 |
(520) 797-4384 |
Powered by Foundation