Dammit..... Hard on the disadvantaged Anna.......
All of the negativity aside, I thank God that parents have the right to choose the school that they believe best suits their child.
When my daughter went there they held it at PV HS. So sorry they missed that special event.
I stand with Rosa!
Living in Tucson I have seen parents who have been happy and unhappy at Basis. One parent/friend had 2 kids at Basis one who graduated from there and one who didn't. She told me herself that in Middle School is where they start to weed out those who do not fit in. I've had others tell me their kids had a learning disability and Basis was not able to help them. They were removed and enrolled elsewhere where they were able to thrive. One other parent who looked into Basis, had her son shadow a student and she herself went and sat in a classroom or two decided not to enroll her son. She said kids walked around like robots and were missing that happiness that kids should experience at their age. Needless to say I decided to remove my kids from the "enrolled list" and keep them at their current charter, Sonoran Science Academy. We have attended that charter for 5 years. They do have a program for kids with IEPs, tutoring help during the week, Saturday school to catch up and participate in the Federal food program for some students. I would say this chain of Charters is more of a role model than Basis. The campuses are on different parts of town with families of all incomes.
In the end..public, private, charter or homeschool, parent s are the ones who need to pay attention to how their children learn and find the right school for them. All kids are not created equal. Once you find the right school, GET INVOLVED!!!! Help out even if it's once a semester! If you can't help with volunteering find the PTA, PTO, Parent Association, Booster etc. and ask what other ways you can help. It's always the parents who are MIA that complain.
Come on, folks -- if you have him, let the owner know. Feel good in 2 ways -- the money for the reward, but also knowing that you've done the right thing.
Old Pueblo, let me correct a misperception. I'm not anti-charter or anti-BASIS. As for BASIS, if I knew parents who were unhappy with their child's school and it was the right kind of child, I would recommend looking into BASIS, after telling them the way the school is structured. For certain kids, the school works well, possibly better than most other schools. As for other charters, some do excellent work, some do mediocre work, some do poor work, just like school district schools and private schools.
However, there is a multi-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-a-year push to promote charters over district schools. The money promotes the idea that charters, and privatization, are inherently superior to "government schools." That's absolutely incorrect. There are no studies showing a significant difference in overall quality between charter and district schools. These people distort the record of charters and district schools, and I think it's important to try and counterbalance that.
If you look through everything I've written about BASIS, I don't think you'll see anything there criticizing their curriculum or pedagogy. I only try to point out, again and again, that their pedagogy works because of the type of students they have, not because it's inherently superior to the pedagogy of other schools. But in Arizona and across the country, BASIS schools are used by the "education reform"/privatization crowd to "prove" that charters are better than district schools. Read what I said about BASIS in the post above. I mean it. If BASIS says, "Yeah, we have a selective group of students who respond well to the rigor of our curriculum and it wouldn't work for all children -- or even most children," I'll make sure everyone knows they have said that, but I'll stop harping on the point.
Hi "Rat". This was Alice Vail Middle. They did not bother with it this year, nor did they 4 years ago, when my daughter went to the same school. Sad.
I stand with Rosa.
Be careful with data on income from the census bureau. The way they gather the data has changed since the introduction of the American Community Survey. Now we get income data more often but it is less accurate. Data at the zip code level can be appropriate but once you start trying to look at data at the census group, tract or block level the margin of errors can rise as high as 40% or more. The map you link to from Ben Bartenstein is one such map as he is using census blocks to present his income data. It cannot be trusted once you look at the actual data table from the Census Bureau.
David is your data at the zip code level? It is hard to tell because you created arbitrary polygons to present your data which are not in any way representative of where people live or where the data was actually collected, basically your polygons do not conform to the geographic boundaries in which that data was collected. You are presenting it in an inaccurate manner.
This all leads to one of the biggest problems of mapping out social phenomenon, the assumption that a population or data point is spread evenly throughout some arbitrary polygon, which we know it is not.
Mapping out social phenomena is wrought with difficulty and it can be hard to trust without the supporting data and some acknowledgment of limitation of data in terms of accuracy.
We really should be getting better data from the federal government on income distribution across the country but since the introduction of the ACS the quality of that data at geographic areas smaller than county level or zip code level is so wrought with error that it is hard to trust. Basically the Feds and Congress have created a situation where even if we know a phenomena is true it can be hard to prove it because they have watered down the data. Why wouldn't they want us to know? :-)
Good luck David. Check out the Census Bureau website for mapping tips, the UA library has some free mapping data as well as Pima County governments.
Do you need map making help? I am sure myself or some other more talented individual would be happy to help make maps for you or the weekly in the future.
This map says so much and really dispels the insane idea that "Throwing money at the problem will not do anything". If more and more funding is going to charter schools, especially ones that are obviously committing fraud or are majorly over funding the administrators( never heard of a teacher being overpaid but hey we could find some in charters), the public schools system will continue to go down. I think we( i.e. the state) should start a major investigation into all charter schools to stop the misuse of taxpayer funds and also to set a criteria for pay. All public school pay is easily accessed.
We also need to have the government come in and see if these schools are desegregated and they too must follow the guidelines set up for public schools. I addition, they should also be qualified to accept special needs children. That would stop a lot from opening and closing if they had to have special ed. students. They wouldn't open but the good schools would find a way. As far as I know, all public schools must service all special needs students.
We started charter schools in Arizona a long time ago ( early '90s?) and look at what has happened. Do we keep using our money the same way and expect different results? We have been touted as having more charter schools (my McCain) than another other state. Hmm and we are 50th in money spent and close to that in achievement. Easy to see IMHO how the changes need to happen . Thank you for the information.
Seems laws still matter after all. Most people are opposed to illegal immigration.
Over the past years we have seen several elected officials make decisions that under-mind the true leaders of this country. Allowing such decisions does nothing for our economy and the American people. When you take a leader such as " Doug Ducey" an allow him to make decisions that cut "SNAP" to balance a budget is reckless. An individual of his class should have a better understanding of the true meaning " American dream" before deciding to cut important benefits to over 2,600 kid's. The question for our new governor should be; Will you help me feed my family or will you explain to my kid's why there is no food on the table. Doug Ducey has had a history of making statements that he was not able to live up to and had to find other way's to correct his false statements. Where does the line get drawn before we stop caring about Americans and even KIDS. A move such as this one only imply's that elected officials only care about there bottom line. It is time that we stand up for our kids and fight for what we need. Its time to tell heartless Doug Ducey that we will not stand by and let you crass our state. Doug Ducey is not a governor, he is a wall street man that want to make money and not help Arizona grow again.
David, is ANY Charter school "good" in Arizona, in your opinion. If BASIS does not set the standard, then who does?
Speaking of "selectism" or "winnowing", let's look at denomination-based schools. Many of them are eligible for Federal and State Aid. Students and parents who belong to their church or organization pay a quarterly/monthly fee for decreased tuition. How many disabled, special needs and disadvantaged students attend these schools?
Are there currently any stats for public school honor students, programs, schools for the gifted that we can compare against BASIS? That would compare the "cream of the crops" against each other.
Finally David, do we really need BASIS to paint Arizona public schools as failures? Isn't the general consensus that they are at least failing? The real debate is what can be done to make them succeed, correct?
"Juicy junior, reallllll juicy".
Please continue to report this, I am very interested in this power struggle.
Americans for American, white and brown.
No other country allows this.
Wendy, I m not going to belabor your incorrect use of English in your first post. As a k12 principal and sole administrator at a school with nearly 600 students, I earned $57,000 in my final year. I did everything you 3 did, and was properly certified as a teacher and principal. I'll bet your school doesn't provide a librarian, health clerk, counselor, social worker, bus driver, cafeteria worker or crossing guard. All of those components increase admin costs so it is easy for you to have higher classroom spending. Your increasingly emotional, defensive, and threatening posts show someone has struck a real nerve.
Just what Arizona and the nation needs, another Harry Reid, Barbara Boxer, Obama/Clinton Democrat in the Senate. Pro-bankruptcy, profligate spending and no borders.
Send her back home
Tucson Weekly |
7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 |
(520) 797-4384 |
Powered by Foundation