Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Narrow by Date

Comment Archives: Last 30 Days

Re: “Danehy

And another bi weekly (now, thank god) installment of the Danehy liberal rant fest, we lived through Obama, now you get your turn. You can suck it.

9 likes, 30 dislikes
Posted by Mark Robert Heywood on 01/19/2017 at 7:01 AM

Re: “A Beloved Local Musician in Need: Local Music Superpowers Rally to Help

And you've just warmed my heart on this chilly morning with your beautifully written tribute to a fellow musician and Tucson resident. I can't make it to Tucson, but am headed to GoFundMe to make a donation.

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by riorican on 01/19/2017 at 6:57 AM

Re: “Dear Mr. President

I'd love to hear Roy Carter's take on Trump a year from now.

11 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by David Moyer on 01/19/2017 at 6:56 AM

Re: “From Global to Local

Remember that fear was defined by the left os a phobia based on ignorance. Have a nice walk.

6 likes, 17 dislikes
Posted by Susan Hirsh on 01/19/2017 at 6:42 AM

Re: “Danehy

Tom is upset because people didn't waste their vote on who he wanted them to? Tom 8th graders are big on crying hypocrite. Grow up and find a way to enjoy the next 8 years. Why not organize community groups to ban and burn bibles? Seems you know God's heart. Hatred has consumed you. Acceptance will cleanse your soul.

8 likes, 32 dislikes
Posted by Concerned Mom on 01/19/2017 at 6:38 AM

Re: “Dear Mr. President

Earth to liberals...temperatures fluctuate. Who told you it would never go up or down? Do you ever wonder how we left the ice age? No it wasn't Trump's fault. Put down the Al Gore kool aid.

8 likes, 37 dislikes
Posted by Hotter Than Hell on 01/19/2017 at 6:29 AM

Re: “Dear Mr. President

Nice to see our daily troll here. What would a day be without 'what's up again'. A man who hates Tucson so much he still lives here, to fulfill his sad compulsive need to complain about his sad unfulfilled life every day.

38 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by Kenneth Groves on 01/19/2017 at 6:24 AM

Re: “Dear Mr. President

This should be required reading for all considering a move to Tucson. It would quickly educate them to the ignorance, hatred and intolerance the 'progressives' have for anyone with divergent views. It could be the spark that moves Tucson from the 6th poorest in the country to Number 1.

15 likes, 37 dislikes
Posted by What, Again on 01/19/2017 at 5:58 AM

Re: “Health Appeal

The ACA. The GOP's alternative to the Democrats Single Payer plan. Written in the GOP's own Heritage Foundation and first passed into law by Mitt Romney in Mass. "Collapsing under it's own weight"? No, handicapped by 28 republican states doing everything in their power to cripple it. So sad.

21 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Kenneth Groves on 01/19/2017 at 5:55 AM

Re: “Pre-rolled Legislation

Thanks Nick Meyers , for a insight to attempts of forces to control Marijuana.

I believe the legislature will act on marijuana before the next legislative session when the roll of the initiative gains steam.

It is my opinion the biggest reason for the failure of 205. Was a new independent department. A new department that had tax, police, court, license powers away from the power of the legislature.

This Gorilla of a monstrous appetite with wanting a new family to feed. This department would have used the existing Felony laws as a tool.

Anyone would have to be just plain blind to think this Department would not have folded itself into each county attorneys use to tax and run the industry. It had to if they wanted police power to prosecute for felonies. DUH!

Prop 205 was NOTHING at all like how other states have legalized marijuana. This is the lie that wants to perpetuate that it was about legalization. Prop 205 was about retail market control and enforcement of the market PERIOD. MONEY !

There were so many misleading and blatant lies slick willy salesmen. If you quarried anyone of the dispensaries owner or principals of 205 how it was going to work it was always left as TBD (to be determined) so essentially nobody really knew what they were voting for.

Even that 6 plant carrot dangled was a joke. Anyone would ask how was that going to work license? inspection? sign affidavit, gain plant material, report output, buy pre tax clones? All of this was TBD that is the failure of 205 collectively.

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by carpet bagges on 01/19/2017 at 5:51 AM

Re: “Dear Mr. President

The letter supporting trump did not surprise me. It's understandable that some people would support what trump campaigned on. He did bring to my attention something that I have heard a lot of lately, usually in much ruder and cruder terms, that the last 8 years have been so horrific. That our president has been such a harm to us. The economy saved from one the worst economic collapses the country has ever faced and with an opposition party trying to sabotage him at every turn. The price of gas far lower than the previous 8 years. Unemployment is up, wages are rising for the first time in decades. Illegal immigration is down and he has deported more than every other president in history combined. Crime is down, the murder of police officers is the lowest in 100 years. The number of people killed here in the USA by terrorists is 1/30th, outside a 1/15th the last Administration. He passed the GOP's own ACA. What's so terrible?

20 likes, 9 dislikes
Posted by Kenneth Groves on 01/19/2017 at 5:42 AM

Re: “Danehy

I learned something about Tom today too. I learned that he can disagree with someone, even have no respect for them, and point out the reasons without resorting to offensive foul language. Without resorting to wishing them beaten, jailed or killed. He also managed to do it by presenting facts and opinions supported by facts. So rare today. One thing I did not learn was that these people are hypocrites. I've seen that as self evident from their actions for years now.

30 likes, 7 dislikes
Posted by Kenneth Groves on 01/19/2017 at 5:15 AM

Re: “Dear Mr. President

I'm sure the comments will all be calm, well-reasoned and respectful.

30 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Gonzo Sorcrachi on 01/19/2017 at 4:53 AM

Re: “Danehy

OK, look. Before you start a flame war against poor Tom, consider this. I don't always agree with Tom, but I _ALWAYS_ learn something from him. Perhaps it is that I'm right after all; sometimes it is something I hadn't thought of before. Tom's job is not to confirm my (or your) preconceived notions, but to teach us something. Open your mind. Read Tom and learn something. I won't tell you what, but I learned something from him today. You can, too. Thank you, Tom.

31 likes, 7 dislikes
Posted by W Corvi on 01/19/2017 at 2:08 AM

Re: “A Dollar a Day, and Other Observations About Ducey's Education Funding Proposal

Given that total funding of Arizona's schools amounts to over $18 billion, $100 million in new funding is a grand 0.5% increase: that's pretty close to nothing -- a rounding error away from nothing, actually.

The point is that Douchey will get a lot more rhetorical mileage from that money than Arizona's schools will get in teacher pay, new programs and materials, or any significant bump in per pupil spending. Douchey is basically giving homeopathic levels of new funding to a school system that is starving to death and talking like he's making a heroic effort to save the patient.

14 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by MBryan on 01/18/2017 at 11:59 PM

Re: “Trump's Election Has Been Very Good For K12 Inc.

Nice article but disagree with final assessment. The bounce K12 received will not continue if their quarterly reports miss the mark. The election and DeVoss bounce will not support a company whose earnings disappoint.

7 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Houston on 01/18/2017 at 8:38 PM

Re: “Trump's Election Has Been Very Good For K12 Inc.

K12 is a great alternative to public schools in Tucson. You can get the required work done in approximately 2 hours per day and then use the rest of the day for advanced learning or life lessons away from liberal indoctrination and the out of control discipline issues occurring in the classroom.

Get your kids out of the liberal Plantation, they are exploiting them for their own personal gain.

10 likes, 21 dislikes
Posted by What, Again on 01/18/2017 at 6:29 PM

Re: “A Dollar a Day, and Other Observations About Ducey's Education Funding Proposal

Ducey didn't sign legislation allowing tax credits for public schools. Liberals added that to the private school credit, which was approved for parents that were being forced to pay twice for education, when they were not using public ed. But I thought public credits could only be used for extra curricular activities as band or art.

If UHS received $300,000 is it reflected in the balance sheet as income to them? So then what is the real cost of a HS education at UHS when the 300K is added to all the other funding sources received?

2 likes, 18 dislikes
Posted by Concerned Mom on 01/18/2017 at 3:37 PM

Re: “Trump's Election Has Been Very Good For K12 Inc.

Students from k-12 have been helped by the election of Donald Trump. As they ask "what is the electoral college and why do the progressives keep talking about winning the popular vote, when it means absolutely nothing?" They seem to be acting more childish than we as students act.

Students band together and ask for a real honest education that includes real historic figures that wrote the Constitution to protect us from enemies from both domestic and foreign. You kids deserve to know the truth so you might as well ask them why they have hid so much from you in some sort of a childish partisan way. Progressive elites use their minions to accomplish sinister goals that uneducated would never fall for.

Then ask, "teacher what happened to Kenny?'

6 likes, 17 dislikes
Posted by Public Ed Is So Broken on 01/18/2017 at 3:28 PM

Re: “Trump's Election Has Been Very Good For K12 Inc.

How about shadowing a student through the school day at one of the recently de-magnetized TUSD schools, David, and getting back to us about whether choice policy is needed in Arizona?

These are schools in a district with the highest (desegregation-augmented) per-pupil funding rates in our region, and as magnet schools for a number of years they had authorization to utilize specially designated "magnet" funds. Part of the reason they lost magnet status was they failed to apply the funds in ways authorized by the desegregation authority, i.e. failed to use the funds properly to achieve benefit for target populations and attract students of a different demographic from outside the neighborhood.

What should students whose neighborhood public district school is one of these malfunctioning institutions do? Go down and speak in the Call to the Audience at a TUSD Board meeting to "I-take-home-$500K-per-year-of-your-tax dollars" HT Sanchez? It's hard to find many signs in this man's record in office that he gives a good Goddam about supporting school sites serving primarily the disadvantaged, as he uses newly available funding sources to give band uniforms to UHS before any other school in the district, and now this year to Tucson High Magnet: both schools that have among the largest tax credit donation totals in the district and also private foundations raising money for them. Then there were his repeated attempts to create a Fruchthendler to Sabino direct-feed pipeline, relieving parents utilizing an affluent-area TUSD elementary school (the one his own children happen to attend) and an affluent-area TUSD high school from having to enroll their children in a TUSD middle school serving (shudder) the disadvantaged.

Don't know about you, but if I were a parent with limited resources who'd had an up-close-and-personal view of what TUSD offers to its less affluent constituents, I'd be taking advantage of AZ's choice policies. Before running another article like this, David, I suggest you interview a few families who've used choice policies to opt out of Ochoa or Utterback or a few Hispanic families who use tax credits to enroll their kids in a Catholic school that is higher functioning than their neighborhood public school. But -- oops -- that would be something a real journalist does, not a propagandist pitching the same sad, hollow ideological BS you usually pitch here.

The day we see the majority of Fruchthendler parents with other options available enrolling their kids in Magee (or Utterback) for Middle School is the day I'll believe it's safe to start opposing choice policy. Until then, blocking choice policy serves families utilizing public district schools in affluent neighborhoods -- families like the (TUSD Sup) Sanchez family and the (Arizona Education Network former TUSD Board candidate and anti-choice organizer) Darland family. It does not serve the poor.

22 likes, 12 dislikes
Posted by How about some real journalism for a change? on 01/18/2017 at 3:16 PM

© 2017 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation