Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Narrow by Date

Comment Archives: Last 30 Days

Re: “Give Me Your Huddled Masses

PEW Poll: Upwards of 287 million ISIS supporters in just 11 countries including 1/3 of Syria Refugees…

Survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah. More than half (51%) of U.S. Muslims polled also believe either that they should have the choice of American or shariah courts, or that they should have their own tribunals to apply shariah. Only 39% of those polled said that Muslims in the U.S. should be subject to American courts.…

The judges need a refresher course in the LAW:
8 U.S. Code 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any
class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the
interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such
period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or
any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the
entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

It is IMMORAL to foist all of the Huddled Masses onto the 40% of the US workers left who generate more revenue than they consume in programs and services.

Posted by Postimpressionist on 02/19/2017 at 8:54 PM

Re: “Give Me Your Huddled Masses

I'm with George Washington when he said about Muslims:
"Would to heaven we had a navy to reform those enemies to mankind or crush them into non existence"
1/16 of the Federal budget went to Islamic Muslim as blackmail to refrain from attacking US ships.

And we NEVER took "Wretched Refuse" in this country. It's when we started taking them that we experienced the down fall:
The English colony of Massachusetts enacted the earliest American public charge (WELFARE) laws in 1645. The arrival in the colonies of undesirables spurred other colonies to enact similar laws. Many colonies protected themselves against public charges through such measures as mandatory reporting of ship passengers, immigrant screening and exclusion upon arrival of designated "undesirables," and requiring bonds for potential public charges.

Massachusetts in 1700 kept out the infirm and disabled who had no security against becoming public charges (Welfare People). The law required ship captains to post bonds for "lame, impotent, or infirm" passengers who were "incapable of maintaining themselves." The bond requirement sought to prevent the new arrival from becoming reliant on public relief. Without a bond from the captain, the vessel had to return the person to his home country.
Under Section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), an individual seeking admission to the United States is inadmissible if the individual, "at the time of application for admission, is likely at ANY time to become a public charge (Welfare Recipient)."

Posted by Postimpressionist on 02/19/2017 at 8:47 PM

Re: “Death in the Arizona Borderlands

Economically speaking, we can't afford to keep them here:
They have made the US a WELFARE STATE:
60% of Households Now Receive More in Subsidized Income Than they Pay in Taxes - REDISTRIBUTION OF INCOME!…

33% of all Welfare recipients are in California. California has reduced Welfare Fraud from a Felony to a Misdemeanor so they won't be deported because they need all the Federal Subsidy like the $20,000,000 they get to subsidize their OVER USE of MediCal.

54.4% Hispanics enrolled in Special Education in California…

These are their parents:
Nevada saw 90% of immigrants flunk the written test in the first few weeks a new driver authorization card was offered. The California DMV (90% failed) is also concerned that immigrants might not have the literacy proficiency needed to pass.…

Legal Hispanics' incomes fall into the first 4 Household Quintiles where they consume 2-7 TIMES in programs and services than they contribute in taxes.

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Postimpressionist on 02/19/2017 at 8:40 PM

Re: “Old West Flavor

No other steakhouse compares to price or quality

Posted by Dan Winright on 02/19/2017 at 7:27 PM

Re: “Old West Flavor

The word would be SAVORY delicious satisfieing

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Dan Winright on 02/19/2017 at 7:26 PM

Re: “TUSD Sideshow

Good job, What Again, you figured it out. Sanchez is the Grijalva's quid pro quo gift to the privatizing powers-that-be in Phoenix. Ducey should pick up the phone and give Huppenthal a call to tell him he's showing their hand. The Grijalvas want the gravy train to continue and the privatizing state level government wants someone to mismanage the second largest public school district in the state in precisely the way Sanchez is mismanaging it, picking fights with the desegregation authority, applying Title 1 funds in ways that benefit the affluent rather than the poor, outsourcing substitute teacher labor, collaborating with Lisa Graham Keegan on a plan to destroy credentialing requirements for public school teachers, etc., ad nauseam.

Heads up, Huppenthal. It's not just disgruntled contractors that want new leadership. It's every WELL-INFORMED parent in the district, most teachers who have seen the inside of these mismanaged schools during the last 3 and 1/2 years, and every policy analyst / education advocate independent of the local political machine who has been tracking the district's sad affairs. Better leadership is possible, and it's what the voters in this democratically controlled district have asked for. Let's hope it's what they will get.

3 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by If they listen to parents they will ditch Sanchez. on 02/19/2017 at 6:21 PM

Re: “Death in the Arizona Borderlands

That's great news kduryee. Increase the outbound rate by a couple times more and these illegals will be outta here in no time! Another great reason for the Wall!

2 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by What, Again on 02/19/2017 at 5:10 PM

Re: “Death in the Arizona Borderlands

What no one seems to know or remember is that more Mexicans are leaving the United States than are crossing our border, legally or illegally. The rate of Mexican immigration into the US is less than zero. We don't need a wall, we need to grow up and do research for ourselves and utilize logic and critical thinking. That means spending more money on education, not on walls. The Pew Research Center is as respectable and non-partisan as they come; here's their report on Mexican immigration:…

4 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by kduryee on 02/19/2017 at 3:27 PM

Re: “TUSD Sideshow

Why are you being so naive? The Grijalva's have owned the district for the last twenty years. There is no room for a cohesive atmosphere. H.T. is simply the tool of the Grijalva's to run the system and that 300 million dollars exactly as they tell him to. H.T. is a documented bigot and serial liar.

By all measures TUSD is a total failure. Thousands and thousands of students have spoken with their feet. Wake up to the corruption, or are you part of it?

4 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by What, Again on 02/19/2017 at 2:39 PM

Re: “TUSD Sideshow

Disruption is very seldom a source of positive change. Having a vision for the future and creating a cohesive atmosphere where everyone feels respected and energized towards that future so that they work a solid 8 hours is all it takes is what really achieves progress.

This is what their vision and mission should be: To provide every student an unbelievably great education.

TUSD believe it or not, has slightly above average academic gains and a slightly better than average measured relationship with parents. They have a foundation to build on towards creating great schools.

Nothing will be achieved by the disruption of replacing superintendents, nothing at all, except for the loss of a couple of years of progress as you regroup and develop a new group of aggrieved parties.

Look at what is really happening. TUSD has an annual budget of over $300 million dollars. So every special interest group that feels victimized that they didn't get their fair share of the loot wants someone else in charge so that they get another bite at the apple. They are quite explicit about this, its just about the loot - one very particularly vociferous commentator made a list that I haven't seen funded in even the most gold plated districts in the nation.

A few express grievances about policy but anybody who has been around policy in large organizations knows that everyone can end up feeling powerless at the slow rate of change. Expressing power by firing a superintendent won't change that and likely won't change policy.

So, quit whining, go listen to some other parents and try to help them instead of trying to help yourself.

0 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by on 02/19/2017 at 1:55 PM

Re: “Editors Note

"I'll tell you what. Come around some time when you actually have something intelligent to say"


Irony just keeled over dead in its tracks...

"Now I'll ask another excruciatingly dumb question that is so pointless, that everyone summarily ignores me. And when they do, I'll declare victory and pat myself on the back for being so S-M-R-T!"


5 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by zippy w pinhead on 02/19/2017 at 1:04 PM

Re: “Dust Devil

Keep to 70 Words. Not 73. You can easily cut more than 3. Good enough though.

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by B. Jones. on 02/19/2017 at 12:11 PM

Re: “TUSD Sideshow

That is so weak Putting lipstick on the pig that is TUSD is not going to help it. It will only further camouflage that rot that has been baked in the last 20 years.

Disruption and drama is the only way change will come.

6 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by What, Again on 02/19/2017 at 11:51 AM

Re: “TUSD Sideshow

All this disruption and drama isn't positive for the district. Ms Sedgwick's comments about the Superintendent's visits to schools is instructive, but insufficient. This needs to be handled behind closed doors, there needs to be an expectation that the Superintendent will spend one day in five out in schools and in classrooms and in the school parking lot greeting parents. These personal touches are critical for creating the sense of community that is needed for improvement.

Ms Sedgwick should go out with the Superintendent on a day tour starting with a school parking lot in the morning - in the most extreme poverty neighborhood. A sense of community starts at the School Board.

1 like, 6 dislikes
Posted by on 02/19/2017 at 7:44 AM

Re: “TUSD Sideshow

All this disruption and drama isn't positive for the district. Ms Sedgwick's comments about the Superintendent's visits to schools is instructive, but insufficient. This needs to be handled behind closed doors, there needs to be an expectation that the Superintendent will spend one day in five out in schools and in classrooms and in the school parking lot greeting parents. These personal touches are critical for creating the sense of community that is needed for improvement.

Ms Sedgwick should go out with the Superintendent on a day tour starting with a school parking lot in the morning - in the most extreme poverty neighborhood. A sense of community starts at the School Board.

1 like, 7 dislikes
Posted by on 02/19/2017 at 7:43 AM

Re: “Death in the Arizona Borderlands

People have been dying since people have been entering illegally. Solution is simple. Stop breaking our laws.

4 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Nations Have Borders on 02/18/2017 at 9:23 PM

Re: “H.T. Sanchez's New Contract and Salary Deal

From reading these comments I must assume that most of the authors are ignorant to the fact that Dr Sanchez has donated large sums of his salary to individual school programs.

Posted by Ken on 02/18/2017 at 7:38 PM

Re: “Editors Note

The comments I've posted are no less intelligent than the commentary you've engaged in for quite some time.

Part of being a troll is badgering people when they choose to ignore you. They have better things to do than to feed a troll. It makes you feel like you're the "winner" even though nobody has even responded to you. In your mind, if they're not responding, that means you must be correct and they have no facts to debate what you believe to be fact. You feel as if their absence of a response is equal to you having the upper hand. It's not always that complicated though, sometimes people just don't want to bother with you. Sometimes people just don't want to be badgered and they hope that you stop once they ignore you. They even let you wallow in your false sense of superiority, just so they don't have to engage with you even when they can easily "beat you in the arena of ideas."

I'll tell you what, I'm willing to make a deal with you. If you stop participating in trollish activities, I will stop referring to you as a troll. Until then, you reap what you sow.

Was that intelligent enough for you?

8 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by CW is really fighting to beat Rat and What at the troll game. on 02/18/2017 at 6:35 PM

Re: “TUSD Board Meeting Scheduled For Tuesday, Feb. 21. Only One Item on the Agenda

Just ran into someone who had received their "quid" from TUSD and had been asked to pony up their "quo" in the form of a public thank you to TUSD's current administration in the Call to the Audience at the 2/21 Board meeting.

So it's clear that everyone in Tucson to whom the panicked "leaders" in this malfeasant district have been able to toss a few coins (and definitely those who hope to have a few coins tossed to them at some point in the future) will be lining up to create the impression that "This is the best administration TUSD has ever had!!!" and to offer their obeisance.

It will be a sick spectacle of "business as usual" in Tucson, for those who go in for that sort of thing. Right up David Safier's alley.

So get out your popcorn, David, and enjoy. (Though we know there will be no suspense involved for you because you'll know what the outcome will be well in advance, right? One of the many fringe benefits of being the most obedient little lapdog in town. You urge people to "stay tuned in," but I'm guessing those of us who know the TUSD drill -- i.e. anyone with a shred of intelligence who has had the misfortune of watching the district's clumsy operations for even a brief period of time -- will not be joining lapdogs like you and members of the general public uninitiated in the malfeasant mysteries of TUSD in watching this sad spectacle.)

11 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Why should anyone bother to "stay tuned in"? on 02/18/2017 at 1:49 PM

Re: “TUSD Superintendent Firing Update: Nothing To See Here, Folks (For Now).

Were you at the Board meeting where they voted to award a $21 million contract to ESI, a manager of outsourced labor, "Sun Riser"?

What did that agenda item and vote mean? It meant already underpaid, long-suffering long-term subs, working one of the most difficult jobs people do locally -- walking into classrooms full of kids you don't know and trying to deliver something resembling "instruction" in very challenging circumstances -- had their wages reduced and their ability to qualify for benefits destroyed. Why? So that the district could off-load the tremendous management problem it had created for itself when their newly recruited, inexperienced 30-something-year-old Superintendent redistributed Title 1 money to reduce class sizes. This redistribution of federal funds meant to benefit poor students had the effect of creating a lot of impossible-to-fill positions in schools on the west and south sides serving primarily low income families. Long term subs, who in most cases don't have teaching certification, had to fill those positions. And then their labor was outsourced. And then an executive in the company to which the labor was outsourced gave two $5,000 donations to TUSD Board members running for re-election who had voted in support of the awarding of the $21 million contract. And no donation to the TUSD Board member running for re-election who had NOT voted in support of awarding that contract.

These are the sorts of things that can be observed in and around TUSD Board meetings if you are well informed and have done your homework, and if you are not distracted by the student mariachi bands and other BS that is trotted out in every meeting, specifically to entertain and mislead people who DO NOT do their homework.

I haven't read any commenters here that give me the impression they "want to hurt somebody," but I have read many commenters who give me the impression that they want this toxic, dysfunctional district to stop hurting its poor and minority students.

9 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by TUSD needs to stop hurting disadvantaged students. on 02/18/2017 at 11:53 AM

© 2017 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation