Zana obviously wasn't reading TW when Mr. Boegle was in charge. The current TW is a mere shell of its former self.
Keep up with the education. Far too many individuals get their sex ed from watching porn. (nothing wrong with porn. It is just a poor source for getting sex ed.)
It appears the striker on 1120 is gone... yay Dr. Sanchez. For those who believe the Special Master is does not audit how TUSD spends the deseg money, I read a list of his duties and you are wrong. It is a PDF file and long and anyone can see it if they google Special Master TUSD 2015. That is his primary job. He watches where all the money goes. Also this is what Dr. Sanchez said yesterday in the TUSD dispatch:
"TUSD's spending is already scrutinized by a court-ordered special master, the Fisher plaintiffs, the Mendoza plaintiffs, an appointed school budget operations expert and a federal judge," he said. "We have no concerns about another audit. We just ask that a reasonable timeline be set so that we are not forced to try to meet court-ordered desegregation requirements without the funding we need to fulfill them."
The only confusion on whether the deseg money is being abused is created by the very people who want to see the demise of public education.
I am so impressed with Dr. Sanchez in so many ways.
1) The $400,000 estimate of the cost of an internal auditor (see previous article) is absurd. The independent MGT audit six years ago estimated a cost of about $100,000 annually. The high number seems to be partly based on the assumption that the auditor would need personal support staff. It has indeed been TUSD's habit to inflate administrative costs by loading administrators with support staff whether needed or not, but that is not what I or anyone else is proposing for this position. The MGT audit also pointed out that "The cost of an internal auditor is usually more than offset by savings generated through improved efficiencies and improving operations."
The district has magically found money for, and the board has approved, buckets of other new spending in recent weeks, including $750,000 over five years to train teachers at ONE school in project-based learning (after TUSD has paid other consultants to do exactly the same thing).
2) The proposed strike-all amendment to S.B. 1120 does not threaten to reduce desegregation spending until fiscal year 2016-17, which begins 15 months from now. That seems to be adequate time to conduct the audit and review required by the amendment.
3) As a previous commenter observed, Hicks and all other members of the board report to the public, not to the superintendent.
4) Do you contact Mr. Hicks for response, for example about whether he is changing his name, before mocking him in print?
@Please be accurate. The funds would be withheld until the audit. A 64 million dollar cut, until the audit is unacceptable to most educators and parents. The legislature hates TUSD, and this is simply revenge for educating undocumented children.
You cannot say, that Mr. Hicks is doing this as a good steward.
RIP Gio Taco
A day to mark on our Calendar. A great soul Cesar Chavez. Xo
Martha McSally, everyone should remember your name for many should do the same. God Bless Congresswoman Martha McSally. :)
this event is an annual event
every last Saturday in March
who thinks that a state that illegally sweeps a billion dollars out of education, then gets told that it has to return 300 million, then ignores that court order and offers 70 million is acting legally now? Where are the courts to put some teeth into the 300 million or the billion, for that matter? Where is the legality in the current proposals? I empathize with you Robin, but I think the question is naive. Arizona doesn't need things to be legal to go ahead and do them anyway! In the same way that our ledge would rather pay for their buddies who own private prisons to profit than pay for our kids to have a decent and educated future, our ledge would rather do this now and litigate its constitutionality later. This has been the name of the game for years. Who counters it and can I see by a show of hands how many of you out there think that TUSD would ever, I mean EVER, get the money back after the state finished its monitoring? All I can say about an independent auditor is that it would have been one more reason why calling for another audit would have looked redundant and stupid.....and I don't think that makes me a troll for any group for saying that.
At any rate, its a moot point now. The loonies are in the ledge, and we down here, with no real power to make big changes (at least right now, since that all depends on elections, and they are at least a little rigged in a broad sense of the word) are bickering amongst ourselves about who the good guys are, or if there ARE any to be found! I'm tired of bickering Robin, as I mentioned in an earlier post, if you are right, prove those of us who disagree wrong by pulling off a budget override, something that TUSD needs desperately!
Careful Vince. They may censor you like they did me this week. The truth just kills them.
TUSD closing more schools? You may get your wish Rat T
They are having to do it themselves.
Does anybody know what is going on with Guadalajara grill on Kolb? The building was condemned and tonight the power is back on and lights are burning.
Why don't we discuss what has been accomplished with the hundreds of millions with deseg money?
Is everybody out there thrilled with the results of 20 years of spending?
EITC gives the poor a windfall from our federal taxes. Cut the crap!
Thank you Martha. that's what you were elected for.
Quality through and through!
So it is better that our tax dollars be spent on unnecessary boondoggle projects instead of on meeting real transportation needs (like fixing potholes, synchronizing street lights, better transit)? Just because a project made sense thirty years ago (and in this case, that is a generous assumption) does not mean it still makes sense now; in fact, all data (PAG's own traffic studies, projections, "lessons learned" from other cities, demographic trends, et cetera) indicate that transportation funds would be better spent on a handful of turn lanes, synchronizing traffic signals, and reducing the speed limit (which, counterintuitively, increases end-to-end throughput speed while creating a safer place for all the other people who use the road: pedestrians, bicyclists, business customers entering/exiting, and so on). RTA would be better meeting its fiduciary duty to the taxpayers by re-examining the need for this project AT ALL, revising the project size downward accordingly. and putting the remaining funds into pothole repair and other deferred maintenance. Times and conditions "on the ground" change, plans should too.
The more subsidies you use the more you get taxed. So don't use them. Nothing is free.
Hey, I have not heard a peep from old Tommy on any Dem lies or scandals.
Maybe something on Bo Bergdahl and the five for one Gitmo swap? Oh hell no!
How about Hillary greasing her brother in Haiti through the Clinton Foundation.
You are right Wes, the money is free and Tom is clueless or just another fraud.
You have become a phony Obama butt boy Tom.
You were correct CW13. Why waste your breath with these phonies at the Raul Grijalva
Tucson Weekly |
7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 |
(520) 797-4384 |
Powered by Foundation