Narrow Search

Comment Archives: stories: Last 30 Days

Re: “Southern Arizona Sanctuary Movement Makes a Statement

What he said is not really important, since it changes from tweet to tweet. Conway says we have to look into his heart. And, if we do, we "know" what he intends to do. One look at the racists he surrounds himself with and we "know" what he says is bullshit for media consumption. What he intends to do is make white folks feel safe again.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Cascabel on 01/21/2017 at 5:42 PM

Re: “Dear Mr. President

Keep posting your foolish and racistly ignorant comments and let the adults fix the nations problems.

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by Now It's President Trump on 01/21/2017 at 5:38 PM

Re: “Zona Politics: Alt Fuels and Climate Change

Algae is a joke and apparantely she has no idea what she is saying

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by john on 01/21/2017 at 4:32 PM

Re: “Hidden Figures: A Captivating Story of Incredible Women

I am so amazed and awed by the fact that these three women beat the obstacles or their time with grace and perseverance. Their intelligence is astounding and to this day to be envied. I wish I could meet them. They are just simply powerful and serve as a testament to what people can do to change the course of history.

Posted by Teddy Speraw on 01/21/2017 at 4:13 PM

Re: “T.H.R.E.A.T. Watch Begins in Earnest

Nice try ac/dc. Everybody has caught on to your tricks.

6 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by AC/DC Will Steal Your on 01/21/2017 at 3:12 PM

Re: “T.H.R.E.A.T. Watch Begins in Earnest

Why do I keep addressing a rock group that is never here?

Why do I think orange marmalade excrement toast is so Grrrreat that I'll want it every morning?

Why do I put ?? in a word to seem polite when I'm actually the furthest thing from politeness?

Why do I feel the need to troll around on a site which I so obviously despise?

Why do I keep responding to my own messages?

Why am I not residing belly deep in my own customized padded cell at the Funny Farm?

These are the challenges I face with every moment of my agonizing existence. I'll have to excuse myself now, my incontinence has got the best of me again.

5 likes, 9 dislikes
Posted by What, Again on 01/21/2017 at 2:08 PM

Re: “T.H.R.E.A.T. Watch Begins in Earnest

Yes Ac/dc, you are a fuc??ng idiot. Enjoy your Trump orange excrement on your toast each & every morning. Just think of it as marmalade and it will be Grrrreat!

3 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by What, Again on 01/21/2017 at 12:26 PM

Re: “Southern Arizona Sanctuary Movement Makes a Statement

Trump wants to identify and deport the most dangerous criminal ILLEGAL immigrants in America and 3 morons hit dislike. Some very scary people read the Weekly.

1 like, 4 dislikes
Posted by CW13 on 01/21/2017 at 12:21 PM

Re: “Southern Arizona Sanctuary Movement Makes a Statement

I hope that the IRS under President Trump looks into whether religious organizations that aid and abet criminal fugitives are entitled to keep their tax exempt status. The taxpayers certainly should not be expected to subsidize this.

It's important to realize that we are not, generally speaking, talking about people who are at risk of being sent back to face authoritarian death squads for being political dissidents. It isn't 1986 any more. We are, generally speaking, talking about economic migrants who snuck into our country, in violation of our laws, because they wanted to improve their lifestyles. Fair enough. Everyone would like to have more money, better housing, better schools for their kids, etc. But that doesn't entitle anyone to violate the law, and it doesn't make them heroes when they do.

Additionally, SSPC is talking about shielding people who are already subject to deportation orders. These are people who have had their due process. They have had notice and a hearing before a federal immigration judge. They just don't want to comply with the judge's order. Ask yourself whether anyone would come to your defense if you just decided, arbitrarily, that a judge's orders just shouldn't apply to you.

As yesterday's riots in DC demonstrated, the left seems to believe that is morally entitled to ignore the law. They aren't. No more anarchy. Enough is enough.

1 like, 5 dislikes
Posted by Nathan K on 01/21/2017 at 10:36 AM

Re: “T.H.R.E.A.T. Watch Begins in Earnest

Yeah. just think. People may have to get off their asses and get back to work. Pity that.

4 likes, 11 dislikes
Posted by CW13 on 01/21/2017 at 9:55 AM

Re: “Danehy

Patty G:

I don't want to get off her back. Especially after looking at those nekkid pictures that she published!

(Insert *Wolf Whistle* here.)

3 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Lecherous for the New First Lady on 01/21/2017 at 8:09 AM

Re: “T.H.R.E.A.T. Watch Begins in Earnest

I'm such a fucking idiot. Someone just informed me that a presidential term only lasts 4 years. Not to mention I was also informed that these next 4 years will not necessarily be great, in fact they may suck a boatload of ass. Hold on to your seat and get ready for the deathride!

8 likes, 13 dislikes
Posted by Juan Two Three on 01/21/2017 at 7:59 AM

Re: “A Dollar a Day, and Other Observations About Ducey's Education Funding Proposal

There are two problem with your argument, "Frances."

1. You assume "unregulated charter schools" and "unregulated private religious schools" can be contrasted with "regulated public district schools." The fact of the matter is that there are regulations on the books that are supposed to govern public district schools, but many of them, including many of the regulations relating to financial transparency, proper bidding practices, etc., are not enforced. About the only thing in Arizona education that is uniform and reliable is lack of proper oversight, and that applies to all three sectors: charter, private, and public district. It's the Wild West, across the board.

2. Conservatives don't want three systems funded, as though this costs 3x as much as funding one system. They want the per pupil funding which is allocated once per pupil to be transportable. If it is not applied in the public system, they want parents to have the option of applying it (or part of it) in alternative schools. It's a zero sum game: when the per pupil funding leaves the public system, so does the cost of educating that child. No one is "stealing" money that belongs to public schools. The money belongs with the child, to support their education. When the child goes, the money goes, too, and that is as it should be.

I know it's hard for monopolists to give up their death-grip on the commodity and market share they've been accustomed to controlling utterly. Their rage at the interruption of their inappropriate and counter-productive privilege is a lot of what we hear in the constant, dishonest "anti-privatization" rants in Safier's blog, in these comment streams, and elsewhere. But perhaps it is time to face the truth: if districts like TUSD had actually provided high quality services and served the best interests of their former students, they wouldn't be having the problems with declining enrollment they've been having now for more than a decade.

7 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Monopolists like "Frances" should stop whining. on 01/20/2017 at 9:12 PM

Re: “T.H.R.E.A.T. Watch Begins in Earnest

David. I suggest you get a deck of cards and deal with it.

5 likes, 18 dislikes
Posted by CW13 on 01/20/2017 at 8:47 PM

Re: “Southern Arizona Sanctuary Movement Makes a Statement

There is no federal law that says these havens for criminals cannot be raided and shut down. So this to holie to be arrested is simply a delusion.

3 likes, 7 dislikes
Posted by Azson on 01/20/2017 at 8:39 PM

Re: “Southern Arizona Sanctuary Movement Makes a Statement

Would Tucson's religious left give "sanctuary" to a white person wanted for federal income evasion, or is it only for brown people?

2 likes, 7 dislikes
Posted by Nathan K on 01/20/2017 at 8:29 PM

Re: “Dear Mr. President

Science is hard. So let's make something up instead.

4 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Mark Flamini on 01/20/2017 at 8:08 PM

Re: “Southern Arizona Sanctuary Movement Makes a Statement

"He is going to deport the most dangerous criminal illegal immigrants." Oh, horrors, we can't have that. It can't be true anyway because everyone knows they are all good people who just want to help their families. They wouldn't do anything bad, would they. Not really.

Perhaps we wouldn't be having this conversation if millions of Mexicans hadn't swarmed our borders. Did the open border advocates really believe Americans would accept an invasion without pushing back.

3 likes, 7 dislikes
Posted by AZRLS on 01/20/2017 at 8:06 PM

Re: “T.H.R.E.A.T. Watch Begins in Earnest

Maybe some of Hillary's people will chalk up some sidewalks and make everyone feel better.

Run, run, the sky is falling!

6 likes, 19 dislikes
Posted by AZRLS on 01/20/2017 at 8:02 PM

Re: “Ask a Mexican!

Hey Gustavo -- I want to know how the "American carnage" of Trump's inauguration address compares, in your experience, to American CARNITAS, as found across the U.S. both at mobile food and sit-down establishments. Michele M, (prima, El Cargadero).

1 like, 2 dislikes
Posted by Michele M. on 01/20/2017 at 6:29 PM

© 2017 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation