I liked them both the original and this remake but thats cos i think of them as different movies. I liked both female leads and whilst i am a fan of Daniel Craig, found him rather distracting playing role of middle aged journo whilst trying not to get sidetracked by his excellent physique and his swagger (which i love) which he just cannot lose tho sure he tried:) Do agree that it would have played better if they had just set the story in America - it wouldn't have detracted from it and probably would have helped. I would give the remake a 7 out of 10 for its own reasons. Everyone is certainly entitled to their own opinion. Surely there is no need to run down someone else's if its different from yours. Isn't this what these forums are for.
The only thing that "flopped" was your review. Better luck in the future (The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo - $80M and counting). Looking forward to the next movie.
I've read the books, watched the swedish version, and have watched this version. There really is no comparison, this version was vastly superior to the swedish version. I watch subtitled movies, Pan's labyrinth being the best in recent history in my mind. The talent of Fincher, the actors, the look of the story fit so much better than the seeminly made for t.v. production of the swedish version. I for one prefer Mara over rapace as well, I think she fit the character more. Same goes for Craig who I felt was perfect for the role. You are just a snob who always claims 'the original" is better for the sake of seeming cool. let me ask you this, if you've read the book, did you read it in swedish? Did you picture the characters speaking swedish with a subtitle at the bottom? I think not, this is a good movie.
The original is better and rapace was a better actress in the role i to read the novels when they first came out and in my interpretation rapace's character nailed it.
I agree with the review a waste of time you can even watch the original with an english dub if your that put out by the subtitles.
Why on earth did steve zallian get a writers credit for something thats been scripted before and copied almost identical to the original with the exception of a couple of scenes?.
I found it very refreshing to watch a comedy that starred a woman. I don't recommend this movie for guys. that is all
I disagree. I thought this film was excellent, and I'm a fan of the book, first and foremost. I've admittedly never seen the Swedish version (I do plan on watching it soon), but from what I understand, Mara and Rapace had different takes on the character of Lisbeth Salander. That, to me, flies in the face of your argument that "this is essentially the same movie with performers speaking English rather than Swedish." I thought Mara was excellent, portraying a quiet pain and anger. She was very much like the Salander I imagined when reading the novel. Fincher's direction is also noticeable in creating a moody, dark atmosphere.
I actually wrote a pretty in-depth review of this film. Check it out here:
Wrong. This is actually better than the Swedish version, it is however, darker and the 'major' sex scene is more violent. Mara did an excellent job in the role.
Tucson Weekly/Bob, you had me @ Colbert & Elf. We share the same taste. I like that. A Merry Christmas, Channukah, Kwanzi & all others a happy holiday season.
I sure wish I could stand to even hear one bit of that movie 'It's a Wonderful Life'. It has to be the most overrated and and one of the most annoying movies EVER. BUT, I respect others' rights to enjoy whatever. AND, I do like others listed here. "-)
Here's a correction: the last time Almodovar and Banderas collaborated was 1990's NC-17-rated, internationally acclaimed "Tie Me up! Tie Me Down!". It co-stars one of the most beautiful women on the planet, Victoria Abril, and contains one of the damndest sex scenes ever put to film. This one's definitely a quirky standout in Almodovar's canon.
Matthew E. Johnson
The point of the review is that this documentary does examine something very important in a whole new way. It teaches that archival film needs scrutiny and should not have been taken at face value all these decades. In short, those who witnessed and spoke of the Nazi fraud and manipulation involved should have been believed and were proven right. Also, now that the witnesses are or will be totally gone, historians need to be aware that the Nazis were master manipulators, as well as butchers and bigots of the first order.
This only reminds me of a Twilight Zone episode - and the versions where you have down-and-outers pretending to be robots does even more so. Check it out -- I believe it starred Jack Klugman -- before you spend too much time on your treatment.
This is a terrible review and you are a terrible reviewer. The fact that you looked at the dancing scene so superficially and were only able to compare it to a car commercial shows you completely missed most of what was happening in the movie. Charlie clearly uses that suggestion to help bond with Max and explain how the boxing industry works, how Max's personality can be celebrated in "show" portion of boxing. This directly helps to bridge the divide between them and bring them closer together. This was clearly completely lost on you.
I dont know who hired you to review movies, but they should seriously reconsider their decision after a review like this. Learn how to watch movies before you write about them.
My thoughts are that you're a moron; and rotten tomatoes has gone downhill with most movie ratings being opposite. Real Steel hd great believable characters with realistic portrayals if what and how robots could be integrated into the world, a solid plot development with a feel good good guys win bad guys lose ending really just made this the best movie in theaters right now.
most of these type killers seem to have a fascination with becomming news reporters, or policers, they get off 0n thinking the whole darn whole dont know who it is already? ha, I mean if u put all the candys, dons, franks, frans, and carry them through to every bobdicknharry, you might understand why no one doenst go to thier churches nemore. Gees!
Silly character? really? I thought Ehle's performance was the best of the film.
Thank you . . . now where do I send the cookies?
You are obviously unaware of the film Soderberg was making. If you are paying attention to the CHARACTERS instead of the actors, you, number one, wouldn't have even felt the need to mention Jude Law's tooth (do shiny objects distract you, too?). Number two, you would realize the parallels Soderberg was making by including Jude's character, in that the fear and misinformation that can be spread, now more prolific than ever thanks to the internet (too close to home, maybe?), can be just as dangerous as the disease itself. It's just as relevant as the other societal breakdowns that played out, the looting, home invasions, etc. This was an excellent film. I liked the fact that it followed an unfamiliar path yet still managed to inspire both fear and sorrow for the characters without resorting to cheesy, melodramatic, and overdone emoting from the cast. I think it's a very smart film.
IM A 300 lb 6'7 redneck BOY and I aint watchin no girly twilight crap.
You had me at bikini. Thanks for the recommendation!
Tucson Weekly |
7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 |
(520) 797-4384 |
Powered by Foundation