Thanks for adding more ideas as your third opinion of Go Set a Watchman. We can all learn by reconsidering early reviews of the novel by Harper Lee. Somehow the adult Scout gives me a more realistic view of the times she portrayed in small town Alabama. Her lawyer father Atticus defended the down trodden and fulfilled his fatherly obligations as the young woman came home from New York City with different ideas. Typical disagreements between generations portrayed very realistically in Harper Lee's first draft of To Kill a Mockingbird, Martha F. Barkley in Charleston, SC
Shooting fish in a barrel again, David?
It's sad that with so much social-justice oriented reporting needing to be done in Pima County, you can't find a better use for your time than writing redundant Trump-focused pieces like this -- as if every liberal media affiliate in the country from high to low, mass market to micro market, legit newspaper to dirty little blog were not piling on with the same kind of easy, obvious disparagement.
Do you expect commenters to congratulate you for your "exceptional" insights into Trump's character? Sorry to disappoint.
Meanwhile, a lot of legitimate causes that could use advocacy go unreported on.
Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was a student activist movement in the United States that was one of the main representations of the New Left. The organization developed and expanded rapidly in the mid-1960s before dissolving at its last convention in 1969.
Just imagine if these folks aged and became university professors. Could it be that they would train future students to overthrow the established government?
In the academic year 19621963, the President was Tom Hayden...
Why that was Jane Fonda's husband. Can you imagine that? Hanoi Jane, referred to as a traitor by Americans.
Is there a plot by academia that just can't seem to get off the ground?
Wait until Trump has the economy moving and he has some time to expose what has been going on. This is going to get interesting.
Let's not kid ourselves. The media surrendered it's rightful place after eight years of defending Obama and Clinton's actions.
Let them stomp their feet and whine, but if they choose to not behave they will be escorted off the property. But make no mistake about the fact that they have contributed to their own demise. And we warned you consistently about the media bias, which you denied.
I don't know if Trump is actually a Republican but he is teaching politicians how to treat the media. Fight fire with fire.
Skyping will allow all media to play on a level playing field. Something politicians always promised but never delivered. (Much like everything else)
Abraham Lincoln's First Inaugural Address March 4, 1861
"........This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it....."
"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it....." Abraham Lincoln's First Inaugural Address March 4, 1861
Public ed wouldn't be so broken if the public in large districts like TUSD had not completely given up on holding governance and administration ACCOUNTABLE.
Your first job as a parent is to ensure that your own child's best interests are well served. If there is a critical mass of other parents in the school system you are using who have the same concerns, the school system in question may have a chance of being responsible. In healthy, high functioning school districts, concerns that motivate and unite parent advocacy have included:
1) that funds are properly applied to benefit the education of students
2) that qualified and responsible educators are employed and retained
3) that administrators are held to account for using their authority to serve students and support teachers, not to enrich themselves or benefit their cronies or the business associates / political donors of the governing board members who hired them.
The problems with TUSD that prevent constructive, successful parent advocacy from forming, or, when it tries to form, prevent it from being sustained, are legion. The people who propose to solve our problems in Southern Arizona by dumping more money into this corrupt, malfunctioning district are irresponsible, dishonest, and self-interested.
They know that while "choice" exists, districts like Vail, Foothills, Tanque Verde, Flowing Wells will do just fine because they are well managed enough that there will actually be reasons for constituents to continue utilizing them. When it comes to TUSD, which "educates" tens of thousands of students in this region -- a significant proportion of all students in public schools in Pima County -- choice must be stopped by any external-authority-derived, coercive method available because there is, for most constituents not utilizing a few exceptional (and well-connected) schools in TUSD like Sam Hughes, Fruchthendler, Sabino, UHS, there is no valid reason to choose this district over other districts or over the various private and charter alternatives. If dissatisfied families using malfunctioning schools cannot be stopped from exiting, their departure will bleed too much money out of the PCDP political machine.
Look at all the rabid anti-choice / "anti-privatization" activists: their connections to the PCDP machine are all obvious and strong. David Safier has made a little cottage-blog industry for himself out of characterizing charter and private operators as for-profit scam artists (some are irresponsible, others are not, but you never hear about the responsible ones from Safier) and attacking the opponents of the politicians who benefit from the TUSD machine. The reason? A valid perception of the superiority of services TUSD offers? No. It has nothing to do with the validity of what happens in TUSD or the invalidity of what supposedly happens in the sectors that compete with TUSD and everything to do with supporting politicians who benefit from TUSD and their filthy quid-pro-quo dealings with hiring and the awarding of contracts.
Readers would have to be stupid indeed not to see through the scam, but Safier still now and then manages to dredge up a few die-hards who drink the PCDP Kool-aid -- including several PCDP Precinct Committee-people regulars -- into making lame comments thanking him for his "research" and advocacy.
What a crock.
That would be so totally unfair to all the snowflakes that have self produced since the last election.
You may be wrong about this guy being a Hillary supporter that was paid by George Soros.
Wow, people may need to actually provide for themselves.
Also I personally think Bill Clinton was a good president and Trump will likely be a terrible one. But it's hypocritical to protest Trump for being a mysogynist and idolize Bill Clinton. Both have active libidos and didn't always color inside the lines if you know what I mean.
This wasn't a "women's march". It was a "liberal women's march". The organizers specifically excluded any women who are pro-life. Not that it's bad, but I think that should be clear.
Even the Tea Party proved that wrong.
They are identical.
Trump approval rating at 57%. I will also be avoiding the malcontents on this site. they offer nothing in the way of solutions.
Thanks, So Much So Little. I agree.
Spare us your wounded, tin-eared morality. Your president has made vile and vulgar the new norm. And if you think Trump is a progressive conservative, you're beyond reason. Trump is about Trump is about Trump. His base might get some things you want out of him, but he will disappoint them far more often.
"The Left Will Now Hide Behind Women"? Are you serious??
Um, yeah, because, women aren't really people, they're more like children, is that what you're saying?
Now, if you had said, "Women Will Now LEAD the Left," you know, because they are indeed real human beings, and they are indeed leaders, and many of them are in fact already leading the Left, well then it may have made some sense.
But, as stated, the name that you're hiding your comment behind is truly idiotic, and more than a little offensive.
It has become apparent by the vile and vulgar responders here that they see themselves as obstructionists. They don't post their thoughts they simply attack others.
Trump won because of them, whether they know it or not. Americans were tired of progressive leftist ideas that seem to accomplish negative progress.
So now the true progressive conservatives will move the country forward. We will be forced to leave these simpletons behind.
To anonymous#1, they left it like every crowd in America does after an event. Did you expect them to be different?
American Thinker? That's your comeback? Seriously? Oh, man, no wonder Putin propaganda is so effective on you. You're not deplorables, you're gullibles. Thanks for the link. Now, hurry back to your bubble.
Tucson Weekly |
7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 |
(520) 797-4384 |
Powered by Foundation