Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion: Danehy: Last 30 Days

Re: “Danehy

William Heuisler:

Tin foil hats are on aisle 5. Next to the hemorrhoid cream.

6 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Walgreen Employee on 12/09/2016 at 12:49 PM

Re: “Danehy

Tommy. You don't like the system, write your congressman. Never mind. If it don't pertain to Mexico Raul the Fool ain't interested.
1960. The Yankees out score the Pirates 55-26. The Pirates won the series 4 games to 3. Why? Because in the world series first team to win 4 games wins.

1 like, 6 dislikes
Posted by CW13 on 12/09/2016 at 11:40 AM

Re: “Danehy

Tom, ignorance is an excuse we cognoscenti often allow you, but smearing Breitbart et al borders on blasphemy of the lowest kind. Breitbart was Jewish, you know, and you risk charges of Anti-Semitism from the easily offended. My percentages, numbers and even assumptions about Philadelphia in 2008 and 2012 are well-documented, but hastily excused as mistakes and double-counting by the Enquirer in Philly. There is even a well documented prosecution of the Black Panther poll-thugs. Why did you avoid mentioning the successful but fruitless suit against Pima County's billion-dollar fraud called RTA where Election officials admitted using software that "flipped" dozens of Precincts and stole thousands of votes that were opposed to the massive Transportation Authority boondoggle? When you prate about documented vote-fraud in the 2016 election you obviously are unaware that these things take time. Are you ashamed of yourself, or just teasing the pitch-fork hoi polloi?

2 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by William Heuisler on 12/09/2016 at 11:40 AM

Re: “Danehy

Tom, quit feeding the trolls!

Those savage beasts may rise above your wrist while you're doing so and remove your hand!

At the very least, Bill Heuisler may threaten you by mentioning that "you better hope that the two of you don't meet in public".

Ask Ron Barber about that threat.

6 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by AZ/DC! on 12/09/2016 at 11:02 AM

Re: “Danehy

As of December 1st, there have been exactly FOUR documented cases of voter fraud in this year's election. FOUR. In the entire country. One Iowa woman tried to vote for Donald Trump twice. Some guy in Texas (falsely) claimed that he was working security for the Trump campaign by trying to prove that he could vote more than once. A woman tried to use an absentee ballot to cast a vote in the name of her dead husband and a Florida woman who was actually counting absentee ballots was adding votes for a mayoral candidate of her choice. (There is no evidence that she did anything to the Presidential vote, one way or the other.) Obviously, Bill H. and others have been getting fake news from crap websites like WND. I don't get it. Your guy is going to be President. He and his people worked the system to perfection. But there is absolutely no doubt that Hillary Clinton will end up with nearly three million more votes than Donald Trump. She will NOT have a majority, but rather a plurality of roughly 48% to 46%. Those are facts, not Breitbart B.S. Why is it so hard to be a gracious winner?

6 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by tdanehy on 12/09/2016 at 10:10 AM

Re: “Danehy

Danehy is so proud to be the floating turd in the liberal toilet bowl known as Tucson.

3 likes, 10 dislikes
Posted by What, Again on 12/09/2016 at 5:03 AM

Re: “Danehy

Mark Harmon probably knows a loser when he sees one and ignored Tommy. Sorry, Grammar Maven but Tommy was never correct in his life.

5 likes, 9 dislikes
Posted by CW13 on 12/08/2016 at 6:05 PM

Re: “Danehy

The President "raping a chicken"?

That's right Danehick, keep it classy

Sincerely, Danehick Sux

PS -- And a hearty slap on the back for yet another name dropping reference from your oh-so-illustrious past (this time to actor Mark Harmon).

5 likes, 9 dislikes
Posted by Danehick Sux on 12/08/2016 at 5:09 PM

Re: “Danehy

@What Happened to Common Sense?

Tom Danehy is correct. The "was" refers to "none", i.e. "not one", which is singular and which therefore requires a singular verb. Thus: "NONE" (not one) of those Midwest states WAS close enough..."

10 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Grammar Maven on 12/08/2016 at 3:42 PM

Re: “Danehy

Tom, that "whopper of a lie" about big city theft of votes can be checked out in 2012 Philadelphia for instance (you know, the city with the club-wielding Black Panther poll workers). Obama received over 90% of the 2012 vote in over half Philly's 66 wards, 99% of the vote in 7 wards and 100% of the vote in 59 Wards. In places like Cook County, Chicago and St. Lucie, Florida there were 10% to 30% more votes cast than there were registered voters. Those Black Panther poll workers had plea-bargained down to a misdemeanor when they were cut loose by the Obama AG Holder's orders.
Don't be nave, I've got more, but you get the drift. Hell, don't you remember our own RTA vote where the Elections Administrator admitted switching software to "flip" precinct votes. That was a billion dollar theft.

4 likes, 10 dislikes
Posted by William Heuisler on 12/08/2016 at 3:39 PM

Re: “Danehy

"none of those Midwest states was close enough to warrant one."

Tommy Tommy Tommy, a plural(states) followed by was? Wouldn't "were" be more appropriate?

And Stephen Mnuchin is a dumb ass? Get your request for college refund completed in triplicate (3). They owe you one.

Denigration, meet yourself.

4 likes, 13 dislikes
Posted by What Happened To Common Sense? on 12/08/2016 at 2:22 PM

Re: “Danehy

And my vote should have counted for more than the vote of an illegal. That's what leaves me thinking she did not win the popular vote.

Let's all support showing pictured ID at the polling places and stop these mail in ballots. Too much possibility of fraud.

Trump can cut a deal with Walgreens for 99 cent pic'd ID cards for the poor.

And do not trade them for cigs or beer!

7 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by All the answers on 12/08/2016 at 1:35 PM

Re: “Danehy

I have a question for the powers that be at the TW. Why do you allow this blithering idiot to use your paper to show your readers what a total, clueless fool he is? His stupidity is truly mind boggling.

7 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by CW13 on 12/08/2016 at 1:07 PM

Re: “Danehy

You obviously dont know how the Clintons operate. And who does what for them. Donna Brazile eliminated her reputation trying to help them cheat. We will never know the truth about the vote count. But it doesnt matter. The Electoral College rules and he won it.

7 likes, 10 dislikes
Posted by Victorious Voters on 12/08/2016 at 12:50 PM

Re: “Danehy

I am NOT in favor of a recount; none of those Midwest states was close enough to warrant one. I trust the election process. However, denigrating voters in big cities is rather petty. The votes of the farmer in Nebraska and the guy who works at a fast-food place in Downtown L.A. should count exactly the same. And Bill Heuisler, please tell me that you don't really think that Donald Trump got more popular votes than did Hillary Clinton. He will get more electoral votes and will become President. My candidate lost and I will deal with it. But please don't repeat that whopper of a lie that the Democrats somehow stole millions of votes. That's just embarrassing.

10 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by tdanehy on 12/08/2016 at 12:42 PM

Re: “Danehy

Michael Barone-

It's been a tough decade for the political left. Eight years ago a Time magazine cover portrayed Barack Obama as Franklin Roosevelt, complete with cigarette and holder and a cover line proclaiming "The New New Deal." A Newsweek cover announced "We Are All Socialists Now."

Now the cover story is different. Time has just announced, inevitably though a bit begrudgingly, that its Person of the Year for 2016 is Donald Trump. No mention of New Deals or socialism.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/the-collapse-of-the-political-left/article/2609139

This is a very insightful article that really defines what the country thinks. And where we are headed.

8 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by The Rebirth Of Common Sense on 12/08/2016 at 11:40 AM

Re: “Danehy

I too must thank Ms Stein of the Green Party for exposing the democratic election fraud in MI. Do you think we ought to check the other states where Hillary won?

http://observer.com/2016/09/former-democratic-congressional-candidate-says-hillary-stole-nevada/

Have you ever heard such talk?

"Do something to determine who's going to win" (?)

http://observer.com/2016/10/2006-audio-emerges-of-hillary-clinton-proposing-rigging-palestine-election/

Clintons be gone with you.

7 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by Blue State Fail on 12/08/2016 at 10:34 AM

Re: “Danehy

Wah, wah, insult, wah. There's the Tom we all know. Your buffoon of a corrupt candidate lost. Deal with it.

9 likes, 17 dislikes
Posted by Mark Robert Heywood on 12/08/2016 at 10:25 AM

Re: “Danehy

Tom, Again you embarrass yourself by ignoring the truth and repeating inane Democratic factoids.
Hillary lost by millions of votes, but tried to steal her way to the White House in a few of our largest cities the way Democrats have done for fifty years. Now Tom, read slowly and try to interpret the meaning of the failure of the Michigan (Detroit) recount attempt. Read and learn:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/05/half-of-… Morning&utm_campaign=TheDC Evening
They can't recount? Why? Because Election Records don't match. A million Detroit votes are lost?
The Left is exposing itself by demanding recounts in urban areas where they stole millions of votes.
Unintended consequences, Ms. Stein?

9 likes, 20 dislikes
Posted by William Heuisler on 12/08/2016 at 10:01 AM

Re: “Danehy

"This includes dumb-ass Treasury Secretary-to-be Stephen Mnuchin, who went to Yale but still says things like, "Any tax cuts for the upper class will be offset by less deductions to pay for it." Anybody who doesn't know the difference between "less" and "fewer" should demand a refund of his college tuition.


LESS

adverb, a compar. of little with least as superl.
1.
to a smaller extent, amount, or degree:
less exact.
2.
most certainly not (often preceded by much or still):
He could barely pay for his own lodging, much less for that of his friend.
3.
in any way different; other:
He is nothing less than a thief.

adjective, a compar. of little with least as superl.
4.
smaller in size, amount, degree, etc.; not so large, great, or much:
less money; less speed.
5.
lower in consideration, rank, or importance:
no less a person than the manager.
6.
fewer:
less than a dozen.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A refund from a college? Really?

Educated elitism rears it's ugly head again.

And the name calling? That's collegiate level stuff..

7 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by What Happened To Common Sense? on 12/08/2016 at 9:37 AM

© 2016 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation