Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Re: “Police Dispatch

Charmin bears don't have these problems. Everything is clean and fresh in their world. Everything put in their toilets goes down, ESPECIALLY when Charmin ass wipe is involved. The Charmin marketing department has made sure of this.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by AZ/DC! on 07/22/2016 at 7:43 AM

Re: “The Republican Party's Education Platform

I sort of like the idea of studying the Bible, as long as the book of Leviticus is emphasized.

Republicans use Leviticus to justify their condemnation of same-sex relationships while ignoring that Leviticus also says that if a woman commits adultery, she (never the man, of course!) shall be stoned, and if a son sasses his parents, he should also be stoned.

As for their using Leviticus to condemn same-sex relationships, they keep erroneously citing the word "abomination," which simply means, in the ancient Hebrew, not a custom.

But try telling that to a political party that's apparently still dominated by homophobes.

Quite a few who've been recently caught with their pants down.

13 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Steve on 07/22/2016 at 6:21 AM

Re: “The Republican Party's Education Platform

If Republicans had their way, the only subject taught would be abstinence and the bible.

they would be taught in caves.

14 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Bob Regan on 07/22/2016 at 6:17 AM

Re: “Good Bloat Days: Bloat Records

Fuck yes.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by nickc on 07/22/2016 at 12:34 AM

Re: “American Babylon: Talking with Libertarian Presidential Candidate Gary Johnson on the Street

In an election where the combined trustworthiness and approval ratings for the two major party nominees does not reach 75%, and where a plurality of voters expresses a desire for some other, any other, candidates, coverage of the Green and Libertarian candidates has been virtually non-existent. (The NYT has published two articles on the Libertarian candidates and one on the Green's). In all likelihood, neither of the smaller party's candidates will reach the magic 15% in averaged polling to appear on the national televised debates. (Is that 15% in the Constitution?)

Someone needs to tell me how either candidate and party can reach higher ratings to qualify for the debates when the media refuses to provide coverage of their candidates. But please avoid circular reasoning and reductios ad absurdum.

Trump and Sanders are correct, the system IS rigged. But both entered into marriages of convenience to run for election as a Republican and a Democrat and either or both would likely be in the presidential debates had they made the decision to run independent of the major parties. Muzzling the Green and Libertarian party's candidates and supporters is thinly disguised voter suppression. It should be illegal.

8 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Rick Spanier on 07/22/2016 at 12:24 AM

Re: “Good Bloat Days: Bloat Records

www.bloatrecords.com for albums, merchandise, tour dates and latest HELPFUL INFORMATION ...and if you want a WORKING POSITION..... inquire with www.thedepartmentofdescriptiveservices.com FIND OUT HOW!

7 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Bebe McPhereson on 07/21/2016 at 11:38 PM

Re: “The Republican Party's Education Platform

Thinking_Aloud: TUSD is like a piñata in a fun house mirror that currently handles the education of 50,000 students every year, and affects the reputation of "public schools" in the minds of tens and perhaps hundreds of thousands more. If, with its democratically elected boards and the "transparency" requirements it is legally subject to, it cannot be reformed, that raises questions about whether it's the theoretical concept and legal framing of public district schools or the advocacy activities of healthy, active, empowered constituencies that make them viable. Then the valid contrast is not between valid public district and invalid charter / publicly subsidized private, but between other variables we have not yet successfully identified. With direct experience in one Arizona public district school that was improbably irresponsible (having grown up in a blue state with an extremely high functioning public school system, I never would have believed it possible if I hadn't seen it with my own eyes) and direct experience of privates and charters, some of which were very responsible and others not so, I don't buy the argument that it's the categories that make the difference. It's something else, and what we need is a better regulatory and oversight system that supports high academic functioning and complete transparency in all the schools receiving public funding. (I get that we don't have that yet and that there are currently irresponsible uses of public funds in the charter and private sector. But there are irresponsible uses of public funds in TUSD and districts like it, so again, condemnation by category doesn't work, in my opinion.)

In any case, the local Democratic Party needs to stop promoting "leaders" in TUSD that give public district schools a bad name at the same time that they continue to condemn "choice." Let them ensure that the district the Pima County Democrats' darlings run is not being RUN INTO THE GROUND and then they can talk about how proper education policy should deny or severely limit "choice." While they find it impossible to manage the district in a way that does not constantly bring discredit on the party and the form of schooling the party champions, they should not at the same time be attempting to limit the escape hatches constituents are using to exit the sinking ship they insist their designated candidates must continue to captain.

9 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Data analysis must include "outlier variables" (TUSD). on 07/21/2016 at 7:33 PM

Re: “Sonic Wave Rider

The "jesus hair" comment is telling and weird. Them damn hippies! Otherwise, interesting article and cool sounds.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Katie Reff on 07/21/2016 at 6:05 PM

Re: “The Republican Party's Education Platform

Once again, comparing all public schools districts to TUSD is not realistic. If you consider, for example, districts like Vail and Benson, conclusions are less distorted and far more meaningful. TUSD is like a piñata in a fun house mirror, bouncing about crazily while citizens strike blindly at its very existence.

7 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Thinking_Aloud on 07/21/2016 at 5:01 PM

Re: “The Skinny

"How stupid does McCain think we are?" Assuming you are speaking for the GOP, the depths of your stupidity have yet to be plumbed. Oh that's right . . . you just nominated an idiot as your king!

13 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by The Duke on 07/21/2016 at 4:57 PM

Re: “Turkey's Failed Coup Attempt: The Charter School Connection

So - how much taxpayer money does this man collect? If he does, then there is merit to this article. If not, then I do not see much relevance. But then, if he is an administrator we will never know because charter schools are not required to fairly report how much they rake in.

4 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Thinking_Aloud on 07/21/2016 at 4:49 PM
Posted by Palisades on 07/21/2016 at 4:15 PM

Re: “The Skinny

Bulletin - Kelli Ward is opposing McCain in the Republican primary next month. Ward is McCain's nemesis, not Kirkpatrick. Get your reporting straight, or are you trying to throw the primary election to McCain with these erroneous news bites? Along with The Weekly's slanted reporting on Supervisor Ally, the outsized biases of this rag make it a laughingstock.

3 likes, 10 dislikes
Posted by toughtery on 07/21/2016 at 4:10 PM

Re: “Marijuana Like Alcohol?

lets ask ourselves one thing all of this monies that is to come from marijuana sales. Where does the money come out of the social fabric of the population ? Will this monies be dispersed back into the economy by market forces, or by gifts given back to the people with heavy administrative costs. This proposed tax windfall is a cancer that will kill the host over time. This takes the very life blood of a free peoples.

4 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Carpet Baggers on 07/21/2016 at 3:35 PM

Re: “Marijuana Like Alcohol?

I dont know about you people I can still get a quarter pound for $200.00. Soon Mexico will stop most all bulk productions they will favor condensing their product down to oils and concentrates. We can thank the marketeers for this revelation and market expansion.

Thank You, Arizona Dispensary Association aka; ADA. This is just another vehicle that the medical needs person has to pay for Make a market to exploit underreporting and expansion. Slap another layer of prohibition. Get all the rejects that could not make it in the Colorado/California market's to come here. These charlatans want to get their foot in the door, then slam it closed on the long time citizens here. Vote for real change not these snake oil charlatans check out. SAFER AZ the only real freedom from persecution.

It make one wonder does it not. With the years of societal rejection and persecution if caught you had a felony and punished for life. Sort of a chattel that had to be paid from your labor daily to those allowed to profit in the market.>>> This was back up by the SCOTUS with the DRED SCOTT decision. So we went to war over one state free one state slave. To appease the masses after the bloodiest war in american history we allowed states to regulate who could vote plant grow crops sell those crops and what part of the economy they were allowed to use. This was called the Russell Crowe.

If anybody can explain how this CRLMA does not follow the same fallacious format dynamic that has been tried in the past, please help me understand. We now have a prohibition this will in no way repeal it it still leaves 13-3405 on the books. If Paradise Valley passes and ordinance. Your ex invites over to discuss old times gets you on the balcony says lights up then calls the cops. WHALA!!! Montgomery has another felony conviction. If parental rights hang in the balance you just lost that because of Marijuana market protections.

5 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Carpet Baggers on 07/21/2016 at 3:25 PM

Re: “Marijuana Like Alcohol?

Ben James Yokel; I must say that is quite a pant load.
please give link to verify your statements

Truth is this will promote the illegal market. This is a peer reviewed study on Alcohol and Marijuana when both became managed markets. Both have exploded in the black market dues to the cost of regulatory fees attached. Here is the link done over 80 years of study. This is done by Washington State Univ.
https://aclu-wa.org/library_files/MarijuanaProhibition.pdf

Also a study done by the Colorado department of revenue. In this study they looked at the matrix of the people that used marijuana. in this study. With so many different parts of the plant now being processed the stems,sugar leaves, broad leaves, used to make extracts for oils and edibles. Which results in under reporting of flower and concentrates. The study narrowed the market down to 650,000 of the users that consumed almost 85% of all the available Marijuana available. Here is the study for those that can extrapolate talk to you friends kids relatives. https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/Market%20Size%20and%20Demand%20Study,%20July%209,%202014%5B1%5D.pdf

3 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Carpet Baggers on 07/21/2016 at 2:51 PM

Re: “The Skinny

I will give RatT my approval. He's right.

6 likes, 16 dislikes
Posted by Julie Heston on 07/21/2016 at 1:17 PM

Re: “The Republican Party's Education Platform

You forgot to mention in your list of things Republicans support which many Democrats also support, "strong leadership by principals, superintendents, and locally elected school boards."

Democrats support that, too, right David?

Or maybe not:
http://tucson.com/news/local/columnists/steller/steller-tusd-broke-promises-with-prop-spending/article_db22aa44-bcf9-5845-bec7-89a189b53e18.html
http://tucson.com/news/local/columnists/steller/steller-tusd-should-take-judge-s-hint-stop-costly-fighting/article_058a6a68-b32f-5c10-b684-3c9f71cb0a1c.html

Perhaps if the public district enrolling almost 50,000 students in Southern Arizona were higher functioning, we wouldn't have quite as much support for "CHOICE" in our state.

9 likes, 7 dislikes
Posted by Support strong leadership by locally elected boards. on 07/21/2016 at 1:12 PM

Re: “Ducey 'Next Step' Watch: 2 Month Anniversary

When will it dawn on you that the whole "next step" plan was based on the assumption that there would be a massive vote in favor of 123? If this had happened, those who supported the first step could perhaps then be mobilized to put pressure on Ducey for a next step. But this turned out to be bad political strategy: among the slightly more than 50% who voted for 123 were many who support Ducey and ALEC and don't want a next step. All they wanted were the triggers and the changes to the constitution, which they got, thanks to you, DuVal, HT Sanchez, Jason Freed, TUSD, TEA, AEA, ASBA, Expect More Arizona, et cetera, AD NAUSEAM. So now we have the so-called "pro public education" groups who got tricked into helping Ducey get 123 passed, and the portion of the electorate they mobilized in support of the proposition is what percentage of those who voted in favor of 123? 10% 20%? 30% of the 50% voting in support of it?

David, did you and your friends attend schools so "progressive" that you never learned how to do math? 10% of 50% is 5%. 20% of 50% is 10%. Do you get the picture? I bet Ducey is shaking in his boots, worrying about what groups capable of motivating such massive portions of the electorate are going to do to him if he doesn't come up with a "next step."

Meanwhile, TUSD wreaks its own special kind of havoc in Southern Arizona, de-motivating the portions of their base they previously motivated. Do you think the people TUSD mobilized in support of 123 will do as they are told by their TUSD and TEA "leaders" next time they are asked?

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Questions for the Author of Serial Next Step Watches on 07/21/2016 at 12:42 PM

Re: “Ducey 'Next Step' Watch: 2 Month Anniversary

How do you expect to build consensus behind forcing a "next step," David, when close to 50% of those who voted in the election thought the first step should never have been taken? Don't you realize that 1/2 the electorate -- and now a sizable number of the TUSD constituents who voted for the Prop and are disgusted with what was done with the money, once it was received -- believe that energy should be focused on undoing the "first step," rather than accepting it as a given, leaving it in place, and moving on from there?

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Questions for the Author of Serial Next Step Watches on 07/21/2016 at 12:30 PM

© 2016 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation