Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: Currents: Media Watch

Re: “Media Watch

So a PIO from PUBLIC SAFETY engages in indecent public actvity while on duty and nothing happens, but a poor tar smearing schmuck from transportation gets publically humiliated by everyone for briefly looking at naughty photo online while on duty. so the FEMALE public safety officer who showed poor judgment in trusting the man she was in a relationship with by taking a photo in her public safety get up, is demoted while a MALE public safety officer showed criminal judgement for partaking in indecent activity with someone he was not in a relationship with while in his public safety getup seems to be totally protected.

I guess it pays to be a male public safety officer at the city of tucson.

11 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by some things haven't changed on 03/15/2013 at 1:33 PM

Re: “Media Watch

hey TW how about some investigative journalism on Rio Nuevo, TCC, Jim Click, the City council, Maynards sweet rental deal, etc?

10 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by अंक बीफ़ on 03/15/2013 at 12:52 PM

Re: “Media Watch

At this point it shouldn't matter if either was actually charged, just being associated with this story and having this kind of negative attention is enough of a morales clause violation (especially where it says their actions shouldn't "reflect unfavorably upon you, KVOA, or its sponsors"). What's fair is fair, and in this case she is in clear violation and should be let go. And TFD should demote him for being associated with something this shady on TAX PAYER time. As for the other people at the station @Saleslady, I guess at least now they can use "I was being detained by the police" as an excuse to miss work.

16 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Rocketman10 on 03/15/2013 at 10:03 AM

Re: “Media Watch

PS nobody is talking about this outside of the crappy little media club in this town. Bill Shaw has a rep as a strong manager. If he is as good as advertised - same for Kathy B - they will have the guts (if it even takes guts) to stand by their employee and not get caught up in a nothing story. But then again, most TV management turns out to be gutless when the heat is on even slightly.

8 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by Localmindshare on 03/15/2013 at 8:27 AM

Re: “Media Watch

I'm shocked this Media Watch isn't about radio. That's all Schu seems capable of writing about...

5 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by lispyperson on 03/14/2013 at 11:10 PM

Re: “Media Watch

Yes indeed. More to come. As long as papers like the Weekly are around to ferret this stuff out.

6 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Yes Bob on 03/14/2013 at 7:52 PM

Re: “Media Watch

I would probably demote both of them. I have just the opposite feeling towards Allison as the above poster. I don't see anything special there at all. Wouldn't miss her a bit.

15 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Weekly Fan on 03/14/2013 at 7:06 PM

Re: “Media Watch

The double standards in this case are obvious; AA has gotten preferential treatment at KVOA and I have to believe it effects moral around the station. Imagine how her colleagues feel about filling in on the day she was detained by the police and didn't show up for her scheduled show and all the shows for the two weeks she'll be out on 'vacation'. On top of that, the embarrassment of more negative attention can't be comfortable for anyone there. As for Captain Baker, I don't understand why his superiors are OK with this kind of bad press......more to come, certainly.

23 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Saleslady2010 on 03/14/2013 at 7:06 PM

Re: “Media Watch

They should keep Allison. She is talented and good on camera. Kristi needs to be canned. She is horrible and comes across as phony. Rebecca Taylor would be an awesome co-anchor with Tom.

13 likes, 14 dislikes
Posted by Kevin D. Johnson on 03/14/2013 at 5:11 PM

Re: “Media Watch

This is old news, let it go! If you're that bored, find out why the Mayor needs TPD security and a driver. Word has it the "suspicious package" he received which accelerated his security scam, was actually a quilt that was intended for Gabbie Giffords. The sender apparently didn't know where to send it.

6 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Jim Gaston on 03/14/2013 at 4:31 PM

Re: “Media Watch

The elitists will always get away with anything they want. After all they are special and are not to be held to the same standards of society.

5 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by nam6870vet on 03/14/2013 at 3:08 PM

Re: “Media Watch

And another thing....my solicitation incident report had none of the names redacted.

5 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Yes Bob on 03/14/2013 at 11:48 AM

Re: “Media Watch

Remember my comment when Martha Vasquez was fired - It was racially motivated. The others have had white privilege, thus they remain.

8 likes, 16 dislikes
Posted by icecld2 on 03/14/2013 at 11:39 AM

Re: “Media Watch

"There was no crime committed" per the report but it took 7 officers to figure that out?? This seems like much ado about nothing more than two people having a conversation and exchanging an admitted hug. The location was appropriately suspect since it was a dead end street. Their marital status is for them to figure out, and none of our business. But if there was no crime committed, it should not be an issue for employment.

18 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by tiredofpc on 03/14/2013 at 10:04 AM

Re: “Media Watch

Maybe this is too obvious to point out, but Diana Lopez is extremely attractive, at least according to the huge portrait of her that ran every day for at least a week on azstarnet. Every. Day. For all I know it's still there under "most popular" articles.

The Star took a three-paragraph story and flogged it for a week because they had one photo of a pretty girl. I felt like I was reading a British tabloid. Yes Bob was probably trying to be funny with his "sexting police officer" comment earlier, but it appears that is the reaction the Star was going for.

7 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Hurri on 03/14/2013 at 9:13 AM

Re: “Media Watch

Certainly more to unfold here....

8 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by SonoranWinds on 03/14/2013 at 8:59 AM

Re: “Media Watch

TV news outlets protecting their own, that's what is going on. Local Channel 9 news director Forrest Carr's explanation doesn't cut it. He says, "It gives the impression that the report might be motivated, in whole or in part, by a desire to make a competitor look bad. Ethical news reporting does not allow hidden agendas, real or perceived." First, this IS news and the community needs to know. It is NOT motivated to make a competitor look bad. In truth, it's a Quid Pro Quo thing....un unspoken statement to the competitor stations declaring that if you don't run a story involving one of our own employees, we won't either. Nice cover up. And did Carr say "ethical reporting does not allow hidden agendas"? So why didn't KGUN run this story?

10 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by northstar77 on 03/14/2013 at 8:25 AM

Re: “Media Watch

Reading the report one will notice a whole lot of brass involved immediately on a simple solicitation call. Preferential treatment from the start. That's where the weekly comes in!

Both married? This is not going to be pretty.

As for the sexting police officer....perhaps a link to these photos would be in order to help determine culpability!

10 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Yes Bob on 03/14/2013 at 8:20 AM

Re: “Media Watch

He had a heart attack and died in his sleep.

Posted by RIP on 03/13/2013 at 9:33 AM

Re: “Media Watch

R.I.P.

Posted by A.J. on 03/12/2013 at 5:26 PM

© 2013 Tucson Weekly | 3280 E. Hemisphere Loop, Suite 180, Tucson AZ 85706 | P.O. Box 27087, Tucson AZ 85726-7087 | (520) 294-1200 | Powered by Foundation