Would you read science daily?
hadley: "...a plant that never killed anyone." Remove your head from the sand! Marijuana of today is a Very Potent and Dangerous Drug!!!
"Marijuana pipe found in car of driver charged in crash that killed Ann Day"
well till he pulled an AMY Schiller , when she made a comment about Trump the audience got up and walked out .. I did the same soon as you put your political spin against Trump .. meaning your voting for Hillary? the most crooked politician I can think of.. corrupt to the core.
and the fact that you would support someone who is so shady and after 30 years in office . the status quote is still the same.. we really DO NEED A CHANGE.. and this country needs to be PROUD again. I don't see that with Hillary, she's been there long enough even 8 years in the white house with Her husband. .
Shit they should legalize weed after I get out of my only college class I have today I'm going to go smoke some weed fuck whoever is against it dude it's a fuckin plant it's logic dumb fucks
Hey Francis, it's your responsibility as a voter to do your own research on who supports prop. 205 and who does not, use the internet!
Kettle, meet pot. Pun intended :-)
Legalizing marijuana will destroy the "fabric/future of our democracy"? Money in politics is destroying the fabric of our democracy-- just look at the big bucks big pharma is putting up against a plant that never killed anyone.
Hey Wrong, Again:
Did you get your Triple K buddies to give you upvotes?
I'm pretty sure you've never received that many likes...ever. Whether it be online or IRL.
So that Voters can be adequately informed of the efforts to legalize the use of Marijuana for Recreational Purposes in Arizona (Prop 205: The Regulation and Taxation of Marijuana Act), a list of Politicians and Educators who support this effort here in Tucson/Pima County should be published as well!!; including City/County Officials, School Board Members, and School/College/University Administrative Officials.
So that Voters can be adequately informed of the efforts to legalize the use of Marijuana for Recreational Purposes in Arizona (Prop 205: The Regulation and Taxation of Marijuana Act), a list of Politicians and Educators who support this effort here in Tucson/Pima County SHOULD be published as well!!; including City/County Officials, School Board Members, and School/College/University Administrative Officials.
Napier was one of only two republicans on my ballot.
The endorsement of Bill Staples by 'The Weekly' is a sham. The grossly oversimplified explanation of what the assessor does is insulting and inaccurate. Had it done actual research, it would be endorsing Droubie.
I would like to ask Mark Napier;
With the possibility of prop 205 do you see Joe Arpaio or one of the other sheriff being appointed to head the board of Department of License and controls by Gov. Ducey ?
What is his opinion of prop 205?
Kris: It's your responsibility as a Voter to do your own research on Candidates. Use the internet!!
So what about all the rest of the people that are up for election? You can't just leave us hanging like that! Like county officials, county attorney, county recorder county assessor, county superintendent of schools and justices of The Supreme Court and judges of The superior court. Where is some information about them? I don't wanna just vote for somebody based on their political affiliation, it's nice to know some of the things they've done. If there's a website or something you could direct me to that be great. On a separate note how come they never let us know about the judges political affiliation? Thanks, Kris
When I was running for Assessor in the primary against Bill Staples, the Tucson Weekly interviewed me and we discussed many of the issues of what was going wrong in that office - the needless and costly litigation, the inadequate systems for valuing commercial property and mostly the horrible treatment of taxpayers who exercise their right to appeal. Since the primary I have even uncovered evidence that Bill Staples fraudulently issued notices of proposed corrections so he could avail himself of another opportunity to discriminate against a commercial taxpayer in court. If he is re-lected I seriously doubt he'll complete another term for all the wrong doing in his office.
Does the County School Superintendent have any authority to try to correct the wrongs at TUSD?
You endorsed for Assessor, but not for County School Superintendent? What gives?
The majority on the TUSD Board must be broken up and replaced with independent thinkers. There are several qualified candidates. None of the incumbents should be re-elected.
What, no endorsement for the only candidate for County Attorney who supports the legalization of marijuana, a living minimum wage, and supports Mark Napier for Sheriff? (that'd be me) Maybe next time...?
WRONG on 2 of 3 TUSD recommendations.
Tucson Weekly |
7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 |
(520) 797-4384 |
Powered by Foundation