Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion: Gargulinski

Re: “Gargulinski

That 'pussy' cat must mean self-responsible.

4 likes, 9 dislikes
Posted by Yes Bob on 12/02/2012 at 10:46 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

Really, now you're going to ban SMOKELESS tobacco from being used like that. REALLY? like....REALLY? are you serious? How about.....No more exhaling your breath on public property. Carbon Dioxide kills too :) All of this is getting ridiculous - seriously. It seriously has gotten to the point where its like......two people could be on trial....one could be a nicotine user, the other could be shooting up heroin in front of everyone....and they'd stone the nicotine user to death - even the heroin user would stab them with the needle.

How is someone using smokeless tobacco hurting you guys, like really. and as a company - they should just ban smoking breaks if thats the issue, its the company allowing them to do it. How many times do you go to the bathroom at work? All that time wasted. tsk tsk. Believe it or not, not just smokers waste time at work. Infact, most the smokers i know at work - work 10x harder than the non-smokers. Funny huh.

and @Nuna - just because your parents decided to smoke - and you didnt like it, doesnt mean it should be banned all together. People with immuno disorders get sick easily, i dont see you banning them. I guarantee you are addicted to something, whether you realize it or not. You realize nicotine is very similar to caffeine - yet we intake caffeine so much we become extremely desensitized to it. It's literally in almost everything we drink now. This is taking rights away from people - and even as someone who no longer smokes , and has a extreme dislike for them, i dont see doing some of these anti-tobacco measures as right. This is taking freedom away from people.

Theres lots of other things that people don't enjoy seeing or smelling or hearing. I don't particularly care for seeing fat people jog - i'm not going to ask for them to ban it. I don't like seeing teenage girls wear furry boots with a jacket but yet have a halter top on and shorts. I don't like really strong smelling candles - they give me headaches. Various restaurants stink as well. People eating fast food tend to pass gas more, and i don't want it smogging up my environment. Seriously people - think about what you're doing with peoples freedoms. One day - I pray you're on the side of having one of your rights taken away, and see how you like it.

26 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Sepsis on 11/30/2012 at 4:05 PM

Re: “Gargulinski

" e-cigarettes, chewing tobacco, snuff " so they are also banning things that keep people from actually lighting up a cigarette and blowing second hand smoke into the air--might as well sneak the real thing than try to reduce the harm to yourself. Many people use electronic cigarettes to help them quit smoking, but because some of them (not all mind you) contain nicotine ,NOT TOBACCO, it is included? To tell you the truth I could use an electronic cigarette not 5 ft from you and you would never know it--also how do they plan to keep people from using chewing tobacco, snus, snuff or any product that isn't smoked and therefore shows no signs of use? This has nothing to do with health care and EVERYTHING to do with posturing.

24 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Debbie Guardino on 11/30/2012 at 1:48 PM

Re: “Gargulinski

@nunaurbiz: So pleasant it is to read still another "self-righteous" post here.

Thanks, much...

19 likes, 11 dislikes
Posted by riorican on 11/29/2012 at 11:40 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

I wonder if the author thinks it's OK to keep paying county employees for all the time they spend huffing on cigarettes when they could actually be doing ... oh, I don't know ... their JOBS?

As a person who grew up with chain-smoking parents and never had the urge to smoke, I resented all the smoking breaks that colleagues were allowed to take while the rest of us continued to work throughout the day. Not to mention all the time off they took because, since their lungs were wracked by tar, they were prone to catch any bug going around.

I applaud the county for this measure. I think the author ought to try giving up her addiction rather than make the rest of the world CATER to her addiction.

6 likes, 32 dislikes
Posted by nunaurbiz on 11/29/2012 at 10:18 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

Is this a reprint from "The Onion"?

3 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by tucdan on 11/29/2012 at 9:52 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

@Yes Bob: Is self-righteousness also addictive?

32 likes, 12 dislikes
Posted by riorican on 11/29/2012 at 7:02 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

Nicotine addicts, like any other addict, are prisoners of their own making. Their disgusting habit goes far beyond their prolific littering, hacking in the quiet of the morning while smoking the first cigarette, and that annoying ritual of pounding a pack of cigarettes once handed to them over the counter. There is simply no sympathy for smokers. You'll get the peace of your own making...eventually.

11 likes, 38 dislikes
Posted by Yes Bob on 11/29/2012 at 6:49 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

People get rid of your home phones. Millions are now using cell phones only. Yes, Cox Cable and other phone companies flood your mail box with mailers and even place call to have you sign up for a home phone.
Home phone serve basically one purpose, for campaigning or sales calls.
Yes, they are needed for fax machines too, but I pay extra to fax at a mail store,

Cancel your home phone service.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Sam Smith on 11/05/2012 at 4:53 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

For your survival vote Democratic. I say that because all the current Republican Governors are giving us a road map of what Romney will do to the nation and the people. Take away our rights. This is the first agenda for Romney. Take away our vote, our voice and our freedoms. The Constitution means nothing to the Republicans, they are and will pass laws to make the Constitution void. Voting smart this year is voting for your life.
The Tea Party, controlling the Republicans are the new American Taliban.

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by Sam Smith on 11/05/2012 at 4:48 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

thanks, randy! good to see you here as well. appreciate your comment...and absolutely adore! your avatar. happy voting!

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Rynski on 11/02/2012 at 7:28 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

Nice to see you here, Ryn. I'd argue that the President has done a good, if not extraordinary job, in extraordinarily bad times. Too bad the best my wife and I can do is cancel out my Mom's and brother's votes.

7 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Randy Harris on 11/01/2012 at 9:38 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

Could not agree more, buy local whenever you can, I give it my best shot.

Posted by Oldwest2 on 10/23/2012 at 5:21 PM

Re: “Gargulinski

awesome! thanks, zack i shall do.

Posted by Rynski on 10/07/2012 at 11:01 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

Hit up G&L Imports on 22nd East of Swan for lemongrass. They also have the best ramen selection in town.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Zack Jarrett on 10/07/2012 at 7:47 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

Hi Ryn,

Most encounters with wildlife are harmless, but the perception depends on your own experience. In my days of field work as a geologist I’ve run into much wildlife including Kodiak brown bears in Alaska, mountain lions, and 26 rattlesnakes in one April morning in Arizona. Most wild animals will either ignore you or try to get away. The only trouble I’ve had is with a couple of rhinos in Natal who insisted they owned the road.

Rattlesnakes on a path can usually be made to leave by nudging with a long stick. And, maybe Flagstaff could employ a few large snakes, such as the nine-foot plus gopher snake that was happily eating prairie dogs at the Desert Museum a few years ago.
-Jonathan

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Jonathan on 09/06/2012 at 12:31 PM

Re: “Gargulinski

oh you lost me Ryn, too bad

1 like, 2 dislikes
Posted by beth gilbert on 09/06/2012 at 11:57 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

The whole artical is immature. Busy POPULAR business generate activity and garbage. If the point was people will always go where their junk is cheaper, that could have been said in one sentence. What do buttocks have to do with anything?

4 likes, 24 dislikes
Posted by Yes Bob on 07/15/2012 at 12:43 PM

Re: “Gargulinski

I hate Walmart because of their business practices. The beat down their suppliers to the point that some become so dependent on Walmart that they go out of business if Walmart can buy it a few pennies cheaper elsewhere.

In one of his books, Sam Walton said don't be afraid to hold a gun to your suppliers head and don't be afraid to pull the trigger. How's that for encouraging suppliers to cut their profit until they go out of business?

At one time, Walmart actually drove the last American company making consumer electronics in the USA out of business because they couldn't lower their profit margin on television sets by another 50 cents per unit. Walmart went overseas and because they were the electronics manufactures biggest customer, they closed and another 400 Americans lost their jobs.

Do some comparison shopping and you will find that many if not most of the things Walmart carries are just as cheap at other retailers.

To me, their whole business plan seems monopolistic and designed to drive all competition out of business. Then when there is no competition, you are at their mercy.

Sorry guys, we need another Walmart like we need Sams proverbial gun held to our head.

25 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by gcohn on 07/13/2012 at 9:56 AM

Re: “Gargulinski

In Benson, only city residents were allowed to vote on a referendum, not anyone else in the county that was also impacted. Wal-Mart is well practiced at getting their support lined up going in. Recent revelations of bribes paid in Mexico come to mind.

25 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Quaking on 07/12/2012 at 9:18 PM

© 2015 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation