Rules aren't for liberals Mark. They are for the supposed underclass.
From the comments policy list; "Personal attacks, insults, or threatening language. Name-calling will not be tolerated." If this is the policy of the Weekly, then the entire Danehy article should be deleted.
Tom proves once again what prejudices he holds and once again who cares. Idiot
Educated into ignorance? Many are suffering from it. You may deserve a refund. Call your college.
You nailed it William. Danehy is " compulsively racially obsessed"
He couldn't go a week on the radio without bringing up race on Emil's show.
Self-hating white liberal thing I guess.
He can never let go of the southern put downs either.
You can see how well blacks are doing in the urban plantations like Chicago and Baltimore.
How many murders in Chicago since Barry became President? What is the black youth unemployment
rate? Since Obama doesn't have any American slave blood in his ancestry, maybe he isn't really down with the cause like old Danehy.
I noticed, like the mainstream press, you didn't have much to say about those ugly remarks by DNC staffers about race, anti-Semitism and gays. Keep up the selective outrage Tom.
There will always be a redneck around to make you feel better about your superior bad self.
You never know what's going to rile up the racist apologists, do you. "You might be black" seems to have struck that nerve. (I'm laughing as I put the period on this.)
Get over this race obsession; Black? What the hell does that mean? When Obama gave his first few SOTU addresses Boehner (sitting behind him) was darker skinned than B.O. He was a dark orange. And White? Most of us are light brown or pink. We all know what you mean, but it doesn't mean much to most normal Americans - except Race baiters like Sharpton or Black Lives Matter people... or you.
Seal is the blackest human I've ever seen and he married one of the whitest women around, but neither cared about so-called skin hue and their children are beautifully unconscious of their heritage - until they meet some compulsively racially obsessed Liberal like you in a classroom.
Get over it; it's a little embarrassing to your friends (like me).
Trump gets ahead by gratuitously insulting political opponents. Danehy gets ahead by gratuitously insulting Southerners. See the difference?
I still don't understand making fun of somebody based on their skin color. Tim your humor appears very similar to that of Hillary Clinton's.
It only exists in your own mind, and makes the rest of us very uncomfortable.
Sure you did.
So you are telling us that with Tucson temps in the low 100’s both of you had your windows open in your vehicles? The truck would have had both of its windows open. What a convenient coincidence for your story.
If he pulled even with you how were you able to see into the back of his truck? If you had pulled up on him you could have seen it, but not the other way around, unless you have some sort of Spidey vision.
The KKK may have, historically, been filled with Democrats but it's all Republican now. As far as any Arizona city being described as the "5th poorest metro area"...........well, ................the Red Necked Lemmings have handed almost total control of the state to Republicans FOR DECADES........SO......any problems the cities face are 99 and 9/10 percent THE CREATION AND RESULT OF REPUBLICANS.
Question, What, Again? Why do you demean yourself by not only reading but also commenting in what you label "a third rate rag?"
"...most of their southern viewers would be wearing their sheets instead of under them."
There you go, he did say it. A pissant bigot working for a third rate rag in one of the poorest city's in America and intentionally so by hateful liberals like Danegy.
No one, including Tom, is saying so. On the other hand, there is a sufficient number that calls to one's attention.
Very few bigots reach your level after calling all Americans that live in the south and watch Fox as Klan members. And you put on public display your ignorance. It is the democrats that made up the Ku Klux Klan.
Maybe you should take a break from Tucson so you can see that this great country is comprised of more than the white guilt hateful liberals who have delivered 5th poorest metro in the country in their quest of communist utopia.
@Dirty, yeah, what you said, "I would just like to add that anyone who HAS smoked marijuana knows that it's level of motor function impairment is far closer to cigarettes than it is to alcohol. You don't see anyone calling for blood levels of nicotine to be measured and arrests made, though tobacco can certainly make a first-time user dizzy and even sick."
If you haven't used it, you have no idea what you're talking about when you compare it to alcohol. The false equivalence is shocking.
As a former senior policy analyst for the California Legislature (a real full-time, professional legislature, not a part-time Republican windup toy), I have to say that the legalization initiative is really well done. It's comprehensive, it responds to widely held public opinion, is sensible (in that it is laid out in a way that people can make sense of it), and it's ambitious.
Ambitious because it must be, in anticipation of legislative meddling that has so far screwed up everything from school funding to publicly funded elections -- and which will certainly be applied by legislative shills for the tobacco and liquor lobbies, and certain churchy sects, to subvert the public will if the initiative passes. (Such meddling should worry Tom more, but in this case, he's willing to bend his values. Sad.)
Danehy should spend some time in the legislative realm as an analyst, to get a feel for the job, although by the looks of his predisposition, I doubt he would be hireable: one thing you need in the legislative arena is being able to dispassionately assess the veracity of claims being made for this or that bill or initiative. Tom is so invested in prohibition as a moral duty, on this issue at least, he's disqualified himself.
I would just like to add that anyone who HAS smoked marijuana knows that it's level of motor function impairment is far closer to cigarettes than it is to alcohol. You don't see anyone calling for blood levels of nicotine to be measured and arrests made, though tobacco can certainly make a first-time user dizzy and even sick.
Also, it is my opinion that both recreational initiatives are red herrings, and all the rambling comments and personal attacks are from a hacktivist muddying the waters to prevent people from seeing the color of the fish.
"appears to have been written by a committee of stoners"... "written in such a ham-fisted manner"....... See that reddish hue?
"I will go my entire life without ever having tasted alcohol or using any drugs."
And if it wasn't for your wife (who set a shockingly low threshold for herself), you would have gone your entire life without getting laid ...
I really appreciate that guys. I was starting to think it was me.
Tucson Weekly |
7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 |
(520) 797-4384 |
Powered by Foundation