Wednesday, August 1, 2012

County Supes Candidate Ally Miller Doesn't Understand Revenue Bonds

Posted By on Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:00 PM

At a debate last week between the four Republican candidates who want to replace Ann Day on the Pima County Board of Supervisors, Tea Party patriot Ally Miller slipped up big-time when talking about the county's road-bond program.

As you can see in the video above, captured by ace videographer Dino Kadich: Miller, a self-proclaimed budget expert, declared that the county “is using (HURF) money for the bonds that we should be paying for with our secondary property-tax rate. We should not be using HURF money to pay for bonds. And that’s what they’re doing, and they’re playing a shell game with the money, and they’re moving it around. … That is wrong, and it shouldn’t be happening, and it needs to stop. In the last five years—I’ve done an investigation here—$80 million has been raided.”

Miller is evidently unaware that county voters, when they passed a 1997 bond package, specifically supported using HURF funds to pay off the roads bonds.

You could have argued against that route in 1997—as the Tucson Weekly did, saying that the county should use a pay-as-you-go approach instead of borrowing against HURF revenues. And you can say that the road-bond money, once it started coming in, wasn’t spent that well, as the late Chris Limberis argued in these pages back in 2001.

But you can’t say the money is being “raided” if it’s being used for the purpose for which voters said it should be used. What Miller is proposing—namely, using property taxes to pay back revenue bonds—is the sort of illegal shell game that she spends so much time bemoaning.

Also: It’s not much of an “investigation” if Miller can’t figure out at some point that her basic premise is wrong.

Call us old-fashioned, but we believe that if you're going to accuse someone of criminal acts, you ought to at least get your facts straight.

We emailed Miller to see if she wanted to clarify her comments, but she is evidently still not speaking to us.

We'll have more on Miller's debate performance—including her fierce denouncement of the Tucson Weekly—in this week's Skinny column, available on many newsstands now!

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

More by Jim Nintzel

  • The Skinny

    Why did Supervisor Miller throw her support behind Huckelberry's legislative agenda?
    • Dec 8, 2016
  • A Democrat in Trumpland

    Congressman Raul Grijalva talks about the forthcoming Trump administration, the future of immigration reform and the protests at Standing Rock
    • Dec 1, 2016
  • The Skinny

    • Dec 1, 2016
  • More »

Staff Pick

Carnival of Illusion: Magic, Mystery & Oooh La La!

Carnival of Illusion conjures an evening of old-world magic by blending their international travel theme with all… More

@ Scottish Rite Grand Parlour Saturdays, 5:30 p.m., Sat., Oct. 3, 8 p.m. and Saturdays, 5 & 8 p.m. Continues through April 22 160 South Scott Ave

» More Picks

Submit an Event Listing

Popular Content

  1. The Weekly List: 23 Things To Do In The Next 10 Days (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  2. Help This Guy Find His Father's Lost Telescope (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  3. Gen. Michael Flynn, Conspiracy Tweeter and Trump Whisperer, Is a National Security Risk (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  4. Phoenix Union High School District Makes a Statement (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  5. Quick Bites: You Can Give a Kid a Cupcake… or Teach Them How to Bake (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)

© 2016 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation