Thursday, December 8, 2011

Want to Try Food & Wine's 50 Best Bars? Better Fly to San Francisco

Posted By on Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:00 PM

best_bars_in_america.jpg

It's a little silly that national publications feel the need to make lists of the best whatever in America. While I imagine a magazine like Food & Wine does have the ability to visit bars all over the country, they are always going to be working off a limited sample size. I wouldn't even feel comfortable saying what the best bar in Arizona is and I've lived in the state and gone to a lot of bars across the state. There's probably an amazing place to drink in Kingman or somewhere that I'll never step foot inside simply because it's not on my radar. I can tell you twenty great bars in the state, but my idea of what's the "best" will always be based on incomplete information.

Food & Wine's list of the 50 "best" bars in America, besides its super annoying presentation in slideshow form, shows off the limitations of the concept. According to the magazine, it would appear San Francisco is essentially the only place in America worth drinking, with New York, LA and Chicago predictably dominating the remainder of the mentions with a few other cities getting a mention for some sort of balance. However, I've had drinks in several of the SF bars mentioned (although F&W left off my favorite bar there, the shockingly affordable 15 Romolo in North Beach) and while many of those bars make a great cocktail, a drink from Scott and Co. is competitive with any of them and at a much more affordable price. I'm probably severely biased in thinking that Tucson bars like Scott and Co. and the bars of Hotel Congress should be included, but I'm imagining that there are great places in other cities that are missing from the list simply because the Food & Wine staff is in the Bay Area quite a bit and can tack on their $15 drinks to an expense account.

It's definitely an argument of semantics to care whether a list is titled "the 50 best" or "50 very good", but as purveyors of information, we're supposed to be telling the truth at the end of the day. Why make a statement that can't be said definitively, even if it's not great for your site's SEO?

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Dan Gibson

Staff Pick

Center for Creative Photography

Performance: Contemporary Photography from the Douglas Nielsen Collection. Presenting more than 100 works from the private collection… More

@ Center for Creative Photography Aug. 9-Jan. 4 1030 N. Olive Road.

» More Picks

Submit an Event Listing

Popular Content

  1. Giffords and Kelly: Congrats McSally, Now Get Working on Gun/Stalker Legislation (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  2. Kade Mislinski Takes Over Saguaro Corners with Promises of a Donut Program (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  3. Update: McSally Wins Recount, Barber gives statement (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  4. A Post In Which I Say Something Good About Diane Douglas (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  5. The Best Bar in Tucson, According to Bartenders, Is… (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)

© 2014 Tucson Weekly | 3725 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation