Friday, September 17, 2010

No More Independent Candidates for Governor?

Posted By on Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM

Arizona Republic columnist Rob Robb notes something very disturbing about Prop 111, which would create a new office of lieutenant governor:

Under Proposition 111, the office of secretary of state is abolished. Its duties are transferred to a lieutenant governor.

Candidates for governor and lieutenant governor run separately in the primaries. But the successful nominees of each party would then run as a team in the general election. The candidate getting the most votes for governor automatically gets his party's nominee as lieutenant governor.

But what about an independent who wants to be lieutenant governor? Sorry, out of luck. Only candidates who are part of a political party with a candidate for governor are eligible.

And what about an independent who wants to be governor? No luck for you either.

Proposition 111 says that “each nominee for the office of governor shall run on a ticket as a joint candidate in the general election with the nominee for the office of lieutenant governor from the same political party as the nominee for governor.” So, in addition to establishing the office of lieutenant governor, Proposition 111 sets up a new constitutional requirement to be a general election candidate for governor that, by definition, independents cannot fulfill.

In an era of increasing disenchantment with partisan politics, why would anyone seriously consider a governmental reform that further entrenches political parties, making them the only route to holding elected office?

Read the whole thing here.

Despite all the disgust voters now have with both political parties, it's not like they embrace independent candidates. At the end of the day, they still end up voting for the D or the R. (Although former Democrat Ted Downing is putting that to the test in his state Senate run in Legislative District 28 this year.)

Nonetheless, do we really want to stop from being able to run for office? This is sloppy, sloppy legislation.

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Previously in the Range

More by Jim Nintzel

  • Taking Initiative

    Here’s how to save a ballot-box tradition before you lose your rights
    • Feb 16, 2017
  • The Skinny

    Activists want U.S. Rep. McSally to hear from them at an open meeting, but McSally has other plans.
    • Feb 9, 2017
  • The Skinny

    Trump takes his first stab at a Muslim ban. Chaos ensues.
    • Feb 2, 2017
  • More »
Today | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat
Meditation and Buddhist study

Meditation and Buddhist study @ Sky Island Zen

Tuesdays, Saturdays

All of today's events | Staff Picks

Staff Pick

A Conversation with Edith Head

A behind the scenes feast of great movie lore and delicious stories as told by 8 time… More

@ Invisible Theatre Thu., Feb. 23, 7:30-9 p.m., Fri., Feb. 24, 7:30-9 p.m. and Sat., Feb. 25, 3-4:30 & 7:30-9 p.m. 1400 N. First Ave.

» More Picks

Submit an Event Listing

Popular Content

  1. TUSD Board Meeting Scheduled For Tuesday, Feb. 21. Only One Item on the Agenda (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  2. TUSD Sideshow (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  3. Death in the Arizona Borderlands (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  4. Does TUSD Board Member Rachael Sedgwick Want to Fire Superintendent, General Counsel at the Tuesday Board Meeting? (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  5. Introducing Priscilla & Ella (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)

© 2017 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation