|  

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Politics Nate Silvers vs. Raul Grijalva

Posted by Jim Nintzel on Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:43 PM

Political analyst Nate Silvers says Democrats like Congressman Raul Grijalva shouldn't get too worked up about the Senate health-care package. Among his reasons:


1) The energy by progressive activists on behalf of the public option has done more good than harm, and by a wide margin.

2a) Nevertheless, the public option is/was a relatively minor part of the health care bill, at least once it became clear that it (i) wouldn't be pegged to Medicare rates, and (ii) would only be available to a small fraction of the population.

2b) To claim that a health care bill without a public option is anything other than a huge achievement for progressives is, frankly, bullshit.

There's more.

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:
By Email
With RSS

Add a comment

Popular Content

Most Read Most Discussed
  1. Federal Judge to Tombstone: No H20 for You! (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  2. Mega Food-Truck Action Tonight and Friday (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  3. Running Against Grijalva? No Voter Database for You! (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  4. You'll Enjoy This Justin Bieber Article More Than You'd Think (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)
  5. Talking Comics: Supercrooks Edition (The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch)

© 2012 Tucson Weekly | 3280 E. Hemisphere Loop, Suite 180, Tucson AZ 85706 | P.O. Box 27087, Tucson AZ 85726-7087 | (520) 294-1200 | Powered by Foundation